Definitely needed !! Bill Bell Sent from mobile
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 5:51 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > > Sure, vote for it. Number of votes do not directly make prioritized sooner. > So you better also add a comment to the JIRA, it will raise committer's > attention. > Even better of course is if you are able to help bring the issue forward by > submitting patches. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > >> 9. feb. 2015 kl. 12.15 skrev Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>: >> >> Do I have to vote for it..? >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: >>> >>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2522 >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >>>> 9. feb. 2015 kl. 10.30 skrev Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>: >>>> >>>> In my use case it could be very helpful because I use the SIREn plugin to >>>> index arbitrary JSON-LD and this plugin automatically index also all >>> nested >>>> attributes as a Solr field. >>>> Thus I need for example to gather all entries with a certain value of the >>>> "type" attribute, ordered by "name" (but name could be a multivalued >>>> attribute in my use case :( ) >>>> I'd like to avoid to switch to Elasticsearch just to have this single >>>> feature. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the support, >>>> Flavio >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure, that's correct and makes sense in some use cases. I'll need to >>> check >>>>> if Solr functions support such a thing. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>> pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I saw that this is possible in Lucene ( >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5454) and also in >>>>>> Elasticsearch. Or am I wrong? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Unless I'm missing something here, sorting on a multi-valued field >>>>> would >>>>>> be >>>>>>> non-deterministic in nature. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi to all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any possibility that in the near future Solr could support >>>>>>> sorting >>>>>>>> on multivalued fields? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Flavio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>>> http://about.me/anshumgupta >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>> http://about.me/anshumgupta >