Definitely needed !!

Bill Bell
Sent from mobile


> On Feb 9, 2015, at 5:51 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> 
> Sure, vote for it. Number of votes do not directly make prioritized sooner.
> So you better also add a comment to the JIRA, it will raise committer's 
> attention.
> Even better of course is if you are able to help bring the issue forward by 
> submitting patches.
> 
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 
>> 9. feb. 2015 kl. 12.15 skrev Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>:
>> 
>> Do I have to vote for it..?
>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2522
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>>> 
>>>> 9. feb. 2015 kl. 10.30 skrev Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>:
>>>> 
>>>> In my use case it could be very helpful because I use the SIREn plugin to
>>>> index arbitrary JSON-LD and this plugin automatically index also all
>>> nested
>>>> attributes as a Solr field.
>>>> Thus I need for example to gather all entries with a certain value of the
>>>> "type" attribute, ordered by "name" (but name could be a multivalued
>>>> attribute in my use case :( )
>>>> I'd like to avoid to switch to Elasticsearch just to have this single
>>>> feature.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the support,
>>>> Flavio
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Sure, that's correct and makes sense in some use cases. I'll need to
>>> check
>>>>> if Solr functions support such a thing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>> pomperma...@okkam.it>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I saw that this is possible in Lucene (
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5454) and also in
>>>>>> Elasticsearch. Or am I wrong?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Unless I'm missing something here, sorting on a multi-valued field
>>>>> would
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> non-deterministic in nature.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi to all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Is there any possibility that in the near future Solr could support
>>>>>>> sorting
>>>>>>>> on multivalued fields?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Flavio
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>>> http://about.me/anshumgupta
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>> http://about.me/anshumgupta
> 

Reply via email to