Thanks Erick. Yes, it is able to work correct if I do not use spaces for the field names, especially for the uniqueKey.
Regards, Edwin On 31 March 2015 at 13:58, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would never put spaces in my field names! Frankly I have no clue > what Solr does with that, but it can't be good. Solr explicitly > supports Java naming conventions, camel case, underscores and numbers. > Special symbols are frowned upon, I never use anything but upper case, > lower case and underscores. Actually, I don't use upper case either > but that's a personal preference. Other things might work, but only by > chance. > > Best, > Erick > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Latest information that I've found for this is that the error only occurs > > for shard2. > > > > If I do a search for just shard1, those records that are assigned to > shard1 > > will be able to be displayed. Only when I search for shard2 will the > > NullPointerException error occurs. Previously I was doing a search for > both > > shards. > > > > Is there any settings that I required to do for shard2 in order to solve > > this issue? Currently I have not made any changes to the shards since I > > created it using > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=nps1&numShards=2&collection.configName=collection1 > > > > > > Regards, > > Edwin > > > > On 31 March 2015 at 09:42, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Erick, > >> > >> I've changed the uniqueKey from id to Item No. > >> > >> <uniqueKey>Item No</uniqueKey> > >> > >> > >> Below are my definitions for both the id and Item No. > >> > >> <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > >> required="false" multiValued="false" /> > >> <field name="Item No" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="true"/> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Edwin > >> > >> > >> On 30 March 2015 at 23:05, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Well, let's see the definition of your ID field, 'cause I'm puzzled. > >>> > >>> It's definitely A Bad Thing to have it be any kind of tokenized field > >>> though, but that's a shot in the dark. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Erick > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > >>> <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > Hi Mostafa, > >>> > > >>> > Yes, I've defined all the fields in schema.xml. It is able to work on > >>> the > >>> > version without SolrCloud, but it is not working for the one with > >>> SolrCloud. > >>> > Both of them are using the same schema.xml. > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Edwin > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On 30 March 2015 at 14:34, Mostafa Gomaa <mostafa.goma...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hi Zheng, > >>> >> > >>> >> It's possible that there's a problem with your schema.xml. Are all > >>> fields > >>> >> defined and have appropriate options enabled? > >>> >> > >>> >> Regards, > >>> >> > >>> >> Mostafa. > >>> >> > >>> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > >>> edwinye...@gmail.com > >>> >> > > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi Erick, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I've tried that, and removed the data directory from both the > >>> shards. But > >>> >> > the same problem still occurs, so we probably can rule out the > >>> "memory" > >>> >> > issue. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Regards, > >>> >> > Edwin > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On 30 March 2015 at 12:39, Erick Erickson < > erickerick...@gmail.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I meant shut down Solr and physically remove the entire data > >>> >> > > directory. Not saying this is the cure, but it can't hurt to > rule > >>> out > >>> >> > > the index having "memory"... > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > Best, > >>> >> > > Erick > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > >>> >> > > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > > > Hi Erick, > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > I used the following query to delete all the index. > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body= > >>> >> > > <delete><query>*:*</query></delete> > >>> >> > > http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body=<commit/> > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > Or is it better to physically delete the entire data > directory? > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > Regards, > >>> >> > > > Edwin > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > On 28 March 2015 at 02:27, Erick Erickson < > >>> erickerick...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > > wrote: > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > >> You say you re-indexed, did you _completely_ remove the data > >>> >> directory > >>> >> > > >> first, i.e. the parent of the "index" and, maybe, "tlog" > >>> >> directories? > >>> >> > > >> I've occasionally seen remnants of old definitions "pollute" > >>> the new > >>> >> > > >> one, and since the <uniqueKey> key is so fundamental I can > see > >>> it > >>> >> > > >> being a problem. > >>> >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> Best, > >>> >> > > >> Erick > >>> >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Andrea Gazzarini < > >>> >> > > a.gazzar...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > > >> wrote: > >>> >> > > >> > Hi Edwin, > >>> >> > > >> > please provide some other detail about your context, (e.g. > >>> >> complete > >>> >> > > >> > stacktrace, query you're issuing) > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > >> > Best, > >>> >> > > >> > Andrea > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > >> > On 03/27/2015 09:38 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> Hi everyone, > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> I've changed my uniqueKey to another name, instead of > using > >>> id, > >>> >> on > >>> >> > > the > >>> >> > > >> >> schema.xml. > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> However, after I have done the indexing (the indexing is > >>> >> > successful), > >>> >> > > >> I'm > >>> >> > > >> >> not able to perform a search query on it. I gives the > error > >>> >> > > >> >> java.lang.NullPointerException. > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> Is there other place which I need to configure, besides > >>> changing > >>> >> > the > >>> >> > > >> >> uniqueKey field in scheam.xml? > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> Regards, > >>> >> > > >> >> Edwin > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > >> > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > >> > >> >
