On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times - > according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has > been used in the past to effectively boost terms in the source field.
Yep, used to be relatively common. Perhaps the API could be cleaner though if we supported that by passing an optional "numTimes" or "numCopies"? Seems like a sane delete / overwrite options would thus be easier? -Yonik
