Thanks Erik and Emir.

Erik: The fact that SolrJ is aware of SolrCloud is enough to put it over
plain old HTTP post.

Emir: I looked into Solr's data import handler, unfortunately, it won't
work for my need.

To close the loop on this question, I will need to enable Jetty's SSL (the
jetty that comes with Solr 5.1).  If I do so, will SolrJ still work, can I
assume that SolrJ supports SSL?

I Google'ed but cannot find the answer.

Thanks again.

Steve

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Another advantage to SolrJ is with SolrCloud (ZK) awareness, and taking
> advantage of some routing optimizations client-side so the cluster has less
> hops to make.
>
> —
> Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
> http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Steven White <swhite4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > If all that I need to do is send data to Solr to add / delete a Solr
> > document, which tool is better for the job: SolrJ or plain old HTTP post?
> >
> > In other word, what are the advantages of using SolrJ when the need is to
> > push data to Solr for indexing?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve
>
>

Reply via email to