Yes it could be :)

Anyway thanks for helping.

With Regards
Aman Tandon

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I should investigate that, as usually synonyms are analysis stage.
> A simple way is to replace the word with all its synonyms ( including
> original word), but simply using this kind of processor will change the
> token position and offsets, modifying the actual content of the document .
>
> " I am from Bombay" will become " I am from Bombay Mumbai" which can be
> annoying.
> So a clever approach must be investigated.
>
> 2015-05-26 17:36 GMT+01:00 Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Okay So how could I do it with UpdateProcessors?
> >
> > With Regards
> > Aman Tandon
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
> > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > mmm this is different !
> > > Without any customisation, right now you could :
> > > - use docValues to provide exact value facets.
> > > - Than you can use a copy field, with the proper analysis, to search
> > when a
> > > user click on a filter !
> > >
> > > So you will see in your facets :
> > > Mumbai(3)
> > > Bombay(2)
> > >
> > > And when clicking you see 5 results.
> > > A little bit misleading for the users …
> > >
> > > On the other hand if you you want to apply the synonyms before, the
> > > indexing pipeline ( because docValues field can not be analysed), I
> think
> > > you should play with UpdateProcessors.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > 2015-05-26 17:18 GMT+01:00 Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > We are interested in using docValues for better memory utilization
> and
> > > > speed.
> > > >
> > > > Currently we are faceting the search results on *city. *In city we
> have
> > > > also added the synonym for cities like mumbai, bombay (These are
> Indian
> > > > cities). So that result of mumbai is also eligible when somebody will
> > > > applying filter of bombay on search results.
> > > >
> > > > I need this functionality to apply with docValues enabled field.
> > > >
> > > > With Regards
> > > > Aman Tandon
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
> > > > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I checked in the Documentation to be sure, but apparently :
> > > > >
> > > > > DocValues are only available for specific field types. The types
> > chosen
> > > > > determine the underlying Lucene docValue type that will be used.
> The
> > > > > available Solr field types are:
> > > > >
> > > > >    - StrField and UUIDField.
> > > > >    - If the field is single-valued (i.e., multi-valued is false),
> > > Lucene
> > > > >       will use the SORTED type.
> > > > >       - If the field is multi-valued, Lucene will use the
> SORTED_SET
> > > > type.
> > > > >    - Any Trie* numeric fields and EnumField.
> > > > >    - If the field is single-valued (i.e., multi-valued is false),
> > > Lucene
> > > > >       will use the NUMERIC type.
> > > > >       - If the field is multi-valued, Lucene will use the
> SORTED_SET
> > > > type.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This means you should not analyse a field where DocValues is
> enabled.
> > > > > Can your explain us your use case ? Why are you interested in
> > synonyms
> > > > > DocValues level ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > 2015-05-26 13:32 GMT+01:00 Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > To my understanding, docValues are just an uninverted index. That
> > is,
> > > > it
> > > > > > contains the terms that are generated at the end of an analysis
> > > chain.
> > > > > > Therefore, you simply enable docValues and include the
> > > > > > SynonymFilterFactory in your analysis.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is that enough, or are you struggling with some other issue?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Upayavira
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We have some field *city* in which the docValues are enabled.
> We
> > > need
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > add the synonym in that field so how could we do it?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With Regards
> > > > > > > Aman Tandon
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Benedetti Alessandro
> > > > > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> > > > >
> > > > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> > > > > In the forests of the night,
> > > > > What immortal hand or eye
> > > > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> > > > >
> > > > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > Benedetti Alessandro
> > > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> > >
> > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> > > In the forests of the night,
> > > What immortal hand or eye
> > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> > >
> > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------
>
> Benedetti Alessandro
> Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
>
> "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> In the forests of the night,
> What immortal hand or eye
> Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
>
> William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
>

Reply via email to