Hi Charlie, Thanks for your comment. I faced the compatibility issues with Paoding when I tried it in Solr 5.1.0 and Solr 5.2.1, and I found out that the code was optimised for Solr 3.6.
Which version of Solr are you using when you tried on the Paoding? Regards, Edwin On 25 September 2015 at 16:43, Charlie Hull <char...@flax.co.uk> wrote: > On 23/09/2015 16:23, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > >> You may find the following articles interesting: >> >> http://discovery-grindstone.blogspot.ca/2014/01/searching-in-solr-analyzing-results-and.html >> ( a whole epic journey) >> https://dzone.com/articles/indexing-chinese-solr >> > > The latter article is great and we drew on it when helping a recent client > with Chinese indexing. However, if you do use Paoding bear in mind that it > has few if any tests and all the comments are in Chinese. We found a > problem with it recently (it breaks the Lucene highlighters) and have > submitted a patch: > http://git.oschina.net/zhzhenqin/paoding-analysis/issues/1 > > Cheers > > Charlie > > >> Regards, >> Alex. >> ---- >> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: >> http://www.solr-start.com/ >> >> >> On 23 September 2015 at 10:41, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Would like to check, will StandardTokenizerFactory works well for >>> indexing >>> both English and Chinese (Bilingual) documents, or do we need tokenizers >>> that are customised for chinese (Eg: HMMChineseTokenizerFactory)? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Edwin >>> >> > > -- > Charlie Hull > Flax - Open Source Enterprise Search > > tel/fax: +44 (0)8700 118334 > mobile: +44 (0)7767 825828 > web: www.flax.co.uk >
