Hi Gajendra What do you mean by "behaving odd"? What odd behavior do you see?
My colleague John Berryman and I have seen many ways dismax has "behaved odd" and we've tried to write about them (it quite often surprises me too) http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2013/07/02/getting-dissed-by-dismax-why-your-incorrect-assumptions-about-dismax-are-hurting-search-relevancy/ http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2013/03/07/the-anatomy-of-a-dismax-query/ http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2013/04/15/querying-more-fields-more-results-stop-wording-and-solrs-mm-min-should-match-argument/ Chapter 6 in Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull>, where I discuss query-string methods & term centric search (dismax is a rudimentary form of term centric search) Hope that helps, -Doug On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Gajendra Dadheech <gajju3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > As i can see in solr code, DisJunctionMaxQuery extends Query, so by default > is inherits the functionaltiy. So Query class has one method called > SetBoost, this is behaving very odd when applied on a DisMax Query. Can > someone guide me regarding how calling SetBoost on a dismax query would > impact its dijuncts [which could be dismax or boolean] > > Thanks and regards, > Gajendra Dadheech > -- *Doug Turnbull **| *Search Relevance Consultant | OpenSource Connections <http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983 Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
