If you are using Linux a simple one liner in IP tables

iptables -I INPUT \! --src www.yourwebserver.com -m tcp -p tcp --dport
8983 -j DROP


If windows, you can do something similar

otherwise it is very easy for anyone to delete all your documents with

http://yoursolrserver.com:8983/solr/your-core/update?stream.body=
<delete><query>*:*</query></delete>&commit=true




On 25 December 2015 at 20:42, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:

> Hi Shawn
>
> Maybe I should have qualified the parameters of scenarios this make me
> comfortable just proxying Solr directly w/o an API
>
> These situations include:
>
> 1. I've got no qualms about giving the whole world access to every document
> in the index. There's nothing protected about anything.
> 2. The content can be easily rebuilt , it's not very large. (I can easily
> push a button and make a new one)
>
> Sure you can denial of service Solr, and I might lose my search index. But
> you can denial of service anything. This includes just about anything you
> put in front of Solr. Moreover, the added complexity of a
> Drupal/Wordpress/your API might only add to the security problems with
> their own security issues. I'd rather keep it simple and have fewer moving
> parts.
>
> Cases where I would want an API in front of Solr (these are just the
> security ones):
> - I want to protect the content (ie based on some notion of a "user" or
> other permissions)
> - Rebuilding the content would be very hard and time consuming
>
> I would also say to expose Solr directly to everyone you probably should
> know about Solr's bugaboos:
> - the lovely qt parameter and the request dispatcher (the nginx proxy below
> disallows qt)
> - deep paging (prevented by the nginx proxy)
> - how to lock down a request handler fairly robustly, how to use invariants
> - mitigating intentionally malicious queries (such as the lovely "sleep"
> function query).
>
> I'm also curious to hear what the websolr people do, or anyone else that
> hosts Solr for the JavaScript app development crowd.
>
> Cheers
> -Doug
>
>
> On Friday, December 25, 2015, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
> > On 12/25/2015 12:17 PM, Eric Dain wrote:
> > > Does allowing javascript direct access to SolrCloud raise security
> > concern?
> > > should I build a REST service in between?
> > >
> > > I need to provide async search capability to web pages. the pages will
> be
> > > public with no authentication.
> >
> > End users should never have access to Solr.  Access to Solr from the
> > end-user machine is required if you want to accept Solr responses
> directly.
> >
> > In one of the other replies that you received, Doug has given you an
> > nginx config for proxying access to Solr -- indirect access.  This can
> > protect against *changes* to the index, and it has protection against
> > high start/rows values, but there are many other ways that an attacker
> > can construct denial of service queries, which this proxy config will
> > not prevent.
> >
> > I think that indirect access (through a proxy) should not be allowed
> > either, unless you can trust all the people that will have access.
> >
> > If Solr is open to a sufficiently wide audience (especially the
> > Internet), someone will find a way to abuse the service even with a
> > proxy, either to cause harm or to learn things they shouldn't know.
> >
> > The most secure option is to only allow the webservers and trusted
> > administrators to access Solr.  All end user (Internet) access to Solr
> > should be handled through a custom web application.  This might be
> > something that you find and install (such as wordpress, drupal, etc), or
> > one that you write yourself.
> >
> > You can still do AJAX while maintaining security.  You'll need to write
> > something in a server-side web programming language like PHP, Java, etc.
> >  This code will need to accept the AJAX requests from your client-side
> > javascript code, validate the request parameters to make sure they're
> > sane, get a response from Solr, and return relevant data.  If the
> > parameters don't validate, return an error, and handle that error
> > appropriately in the javascript code.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
>
> --
> *Doug Turnbull **| *Search Relevance Consultant | OpenSource Connections
> <http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983
> Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>

Reply via email to