Please help me understand why queries like wildcard, prefix and few others are re-written into constant score query? Why the scoring factors are not taken into consideration in such queries?
Please correct me if I am wrong that this behavior is per the query type irrespective of the parser used. Thanks, Modassar On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response Ahmet. > > Best, > Modassar > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think wildcard queries fl:networ* are re-written into Constant Score >> Query. >> fl=*,score should returns same score for all documents that are retrieved. >> >> Ahmet >> >> >> >> On Monday, January 4, 2016 12:22 PM, Modassar Ather < >> modather1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Kindly help me understand how will relevance ranking differ int following >> searches. >> >> query : fl:network >> query : fl:networ* >> >> What I am observing that the results returned are different in both of >> them >> in a way that the top documents returned for q=fl:network is not present >> in >> the top results of q=fl:networ*. >> For example for q=fl:network I am getting top documents having around 20 >> occurrence of network whereas the top result of q=fl:networ* has only >> couple of occurrence of network. >> I am aware of the underlying normalization process participation in >> relevance ranking of documents but not able to understand such a >> difference >> in the ranking of result for the queries. >> >> Thanks, >> Modassar >> > >
