Thanks Philippe.

i am using hl.fl=*, when a field is available in highlight section, is it
possible to skip that filed in the main response ? please clarify.

Regards,
Anil

On 18 February 2016 at 08:42, Philippe Soares <soa...@gqlifesciences.com>
wrote:

> You can put fields that you want to retrieve without highlighting in the
> "fl" parameter, and the large fields in the "hl.fl" parameter. Those will
> go in the highlight section only. It may also be a good idea to add
> hl.requiresFieldMatch=true.
>
> E.g. : fl=id&hl=true&hl.fl=field1,field2&hl.requireFieldMatch=true
>
> Note that you can also use wildcards in fl or hl.fl. So if you want to
> highlight all the fields, just set hl.fl=*
> On Feb 17, 2016 21:49, "Anil" <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Binoy. But this may not help my usecase.
> >
> > I am storing and indexing huge documents in solr. when no search text
> > matches with that filed text, i should skip that field of the document.
> > when match exists, it should be part of highlight section.
> >
> > fl may not be right option in my case.
> >
> > Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anil
> >
> > On 16 February 2016 at 13:43, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah.
> > > Under <lst name="defaults"> an entry like so:
> > > <str name="fl">fields</str>
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 13:00 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > you mean default fl ?
> > > >
> > > > On 16 February 2016 at 12:57, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Oh wait. We don't append the fl parameter to the query.
> > > > > We've configured it in the request handler in solrconfig.xml
> > > > > Maybe that is something that you can do.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 12:39 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your response Binoy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes.I am looking for any alternative to this. With long number of
> > > > fileds,
> > > > > > url will become long and might lead to "url too long exception"
> > when
> > > > > using
> > > > > > http request.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 16 February 2016 at 11:01, Binoy Dalal <
> binoydala...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Filling in the fl parameter with all the required fields is
> what
> > we
> > > > do
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > my project as well, and I don't think there is any alternative
> to
> > > > this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe somebody else can advise on this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 10:30 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any help on this ? Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 15 February 2016 at 19:06, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes. But i have long list of fields.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i feel adding all the fileds in fl is not good practice
> > unless
> > > > one
> > > > > > > > > interested in few fields. In my case, i am interested in
> all
> > > > fields
> > > > > > > > except
> > > > > > > > > the one .
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > is there any alternative approach ? Thanks in advance.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 15 February 2016 at 17:27, Binoy Dalal <
> > > > binoydala...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> If I understand correctly, you have already highlighted
> the
> > > > field
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > >> want to return the highlights and not the field itself.
> > > > > > > > >> Well in that case, simply remove the field name from your
> fl
> > > > list.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, 17:04 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > HOw can highlighted field excluded in the main result ?
> as
> > > it
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> available
> > > > > > > > >> > in the highlight section.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > In my scenario, One filed (lets say commands) of the
> each
> > > solr
> > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > >> > would be around 10 mg. I dont want to fetch that filed
> in
> > > > > response
> > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > >> its
> > > > > > > > >> > highlight snippets available in the response.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Please advice.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > On 15 February 2016 at 15:36, Evert R. <
> > > evert.ra...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Hello Mark,
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Thanks for you reply.
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > All text is indexed (1 pdf file). It works now.
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Best regard,
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > *--Evert*
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > 2016-02-14 23:47 GMT-02:00 Mark Ehle <
> > marke...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > is all the text being indexed? Check to make sure
> that
> > > > > there's
> > > > > > > > >> actually
> > > > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > data you are looking for in the index. Is there a
> > > setting
> > > > in
> > > > > > > tika
> > > > > > > > >> that
> > > > > > > > >> > > > limits how much is indexed? I seem to remember
> > > confronting
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > >> problem
> > > > > > > > >> > > > myself once, and the data that I wanted just wasn't
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > index
> > > > > > > > >> > because
> > > > > > > > >> > > it
> > > > > > > > >> > > > was never put there in the first place.Something
> about
> > > > > > > > >> > setMaxStringLength
> > > > > > > > >> > > > orsomething.
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Binoy Dalal <
> > > > > > > > >> binoydala...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > What you've done so far will highlight every
> > instance
> > > of
> > > > > > > > "nietava"
> > > > > > > > >> > > found
> > > > > > > > >> > > > in
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > the field, and return it, i.e., your entire field
> > will
> > > > > > return
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > >> > all
> > > > > > > > >> > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > "nietava"s in <em> tags.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > If you do not want the entire field, only portions
> > of
> > > > your
> > > > > > > field
> > > > > > > > >> > > > containing
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > the matched terms, then use hl.snippets parameter
> =
> > > the
> > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > >> > > > snippets
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > you want, in this particular case 3, along with
> the
> > > > > > > hl.fragsize
> > > > > > > > >> > > parameter
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > set to the same number as your hl.mazAnalyzedChars
> > > (or a
> > > > > > > really
> > > > > > > > >> large
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > number).
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I suggest you go through the wiki documentation
> for
> > > > > > > highlighting
> > > > > > > > >> > once (
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
> > ).
> > > > It
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > >> > answer
> > > > > > > > >> > > > all
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > of your questions regarding the use of the
> standard
> > > > > > > highlighter
> > > > > > > > >> that
> > > > > > > > >> > > you
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > might have.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > As an additional note, I also suggest that you
> look
> > > into
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > PostingsHighlighter (
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Postings+Highlighter
> > > > > > > > >> > > ),
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > since you seem to be running highlighting on
> pretty
> > > big
> > > > > > fields
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> > > > postings
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > is much more efficient at highlighting huge fields
> > as
> > > > > > compared
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > standard highlighter.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:15 AM Evert R. <
> > > > > > > evert.ra...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Binoy,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > You are the man! =)
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thank you very much!
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Would you by chance know how could I get the
> > second
> > > > > > > highlight
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > same
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > word in the same file?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Like: file_1.pdf (has three words "nietava")
> > so...,
> > > > how
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > >> bring
> > > > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > highlighs for the three occurrences?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I am pretty new around, should I send (open)
> > another
> > > > > > > subject?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks again!
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > *--Evert*
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > 2016-02-14 16:40 GMT-02:00 Binoy Dalal <
> > > > > > > > binoydala...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> >:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Are you sure you've typed in the parameters
> > > > correctly?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In your response it says flagsize instead of
> > > > fragsize
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > maxanalzyedchars
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > instead of maxanalyzedchars.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Ohh wait, I see that I made the analyzed typo.
> > > > Awfully
> > > > > > > sorry
> > > > > > > > >> for
> > > > > > > > >> > > > that,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > using my phone to send the mail out.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, 23:53 Evert R. <
> > > > > > > evert.ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Binoy,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > thanks!
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Still not working, check the output:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >   "responseHeader":{
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >     "status":0,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >     "QTime":58,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >     "params":{
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "q":"nietava",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "hl":"true",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "hl.simple.post":"</em>",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "indent":"true",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "fl":"id",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "hl.flagsize":"0",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "hl.fl":"content",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "hl.maxAnalzyedChars":"208400",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "wt":"json",
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       "hl.simple.pre":"<em>"}},
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
>  "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >       {
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >  "id":"/home/solr/dados/teste/Emmanuel.pdf"}]
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >   },
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >   "highlighting":{
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
>  "/home/solr/dados/teste/Emmanuel.pdf":{}}}
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > *--Evert*
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2016-02-14 14:31 GMT-02:00 Binoy Dalal <
> > > > > > > > >> binoydala...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> > >:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Don't add this parameter to the
> > > searchComponent
> > > > > > > > >> definition,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > because
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > components where you've added it,
> > > GapFragmenter
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > RegexFragmenter,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > simply
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > don't use it.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Instead, add it to your request handler
> > > (/select
> > > > > > etc.)
> > > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > >> > > you've
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > configured
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > highlighting in the handler or append it
> to
> > > your
> > > > > > > query:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > *&hl.maxAnalzyedChars=<some_really_big_number>*.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Additionally also set the *hl.fragsize
> > > parameter
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > 0*,
> > > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > >> > your
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > text
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > larger than 51200 chars which it mostly
> is,
> > > in a
> > > > > > > similar
> > > > > > > > >> > > fashion.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:02 PM Evert R. <
> > > > > > > > >> > > evert.ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Binoy,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I could not find this option in my
> > > > > solrconfig.xml
> > > > > > > > file.
> > > > > > > > >> ]
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I tryied to add this setting and nothing
> > > > > > changed...
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Here is the code, I might miss placed:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <code>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <searchComponent
> > > > class="solr.HighlightComponent"
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > name="highlight">
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >     <highlighting>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       <!-- Configure the standard
> > fragmenter
> > > > -->
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       <!-- This could most likely be
> > > commented
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > "default"
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > case
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -->
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       <fragmenter name="gap"
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >                   default="true"
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  class="solr.highlight.GapFragmenter">
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >         <lst name="defaults">
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <int
> > name="hl.fragsize">400</int>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <int
> > > > > > > name="hl.maxAnalyzedChars">409600</int>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >         </lst>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       </fragmenter>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       <!-- A regular-expression-based
> > > > fragmenter
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >            (for sentence extraction)
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >         -->
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       <fragmenter name="regex"
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>  class="solr.highlight.RegexFragmenter">
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >         <lst name="defaults">
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <!-- slightly smaller
> fragsizes
> > > work
> > > > > > > better
> > > > > > > > >> > because
> > > > > > > > >> > > > of
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > slop
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -->
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <int
> > name="hl.fragsize">200</int>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <int
> > > > > > > name="hl.maxAnalyzedChars">409600</int>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <!-- allow 50% slop on
> fragment
> > > > sizes
> > > > > > -->
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <float
> > > > > name="hl.regex.slop">0.5</float>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <!-- a basic sentence pattern
> > -->
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >           <str
> > name="hl.regex.pattern">[-\w
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ,/\n\&quot;&apos;]{20,200}</str>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >         </lst>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >       </fragmenter>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > </code>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > thanks!
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > *--Evert*
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2016-02-14 12:14 GMT-02:00 Binoy Dalal <
> > > > > > > > >> > > binoydala...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > From the solr wiki:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > hl.maxAnalyzedChars
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > How many characters into a document to
> > > look
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > >> suitable
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > snippets  Solr1.3. This parameter
> makes
> > > > sense
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > original
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Highlighter
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > only.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > The default value is "51200".
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > You can assign a large value to this
> > > > parameter
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > hl.fragsize=0
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > return highlighting in large fields
> that
> > > > have
> > > > > > size
> > > > > > > > >> > greater
> > > > > > > > >> > > > than
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 51200
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > characters.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be your hiccup.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, 17:11 Evert R. <
> > > > > > > > >> > evert.ra...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry my late reply.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > All the content is inside de docs.
> It
> > > > brings
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> docs
> > > > > > > > >> > and
> > > > > > > > >> > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > pdf
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > file
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > has the search word in it. But the
> > > > highlight
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > >> > > showing
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > if
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > search
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > word is after a few pages.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Evert
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *--Evert*
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-02-14 8:36 GMT-02:00 Paul
> > > Libbrecht <
> > > > > > > > >> > > > p...@hoplahup.net
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like the stored content
> > is
> > > > > > > shortened.
> > > > > > > > >> Can
> > > > > > > > >> > it
> > > > > > > > >> > > > be?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see that inside the docs?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > paul
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Evert R. <mailto:
> > > > evert.ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 14 February 2016 at 11:26
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi There,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a situation where
> started a
> > > > > > > > techproducts,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > without
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > modification,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > post a pdf file. When searching
> > as:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > q=text:search_word
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hl=true
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hl.fl=content
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It show the highlight
> accordingly!
> > > =)
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUT... *if the "search_word" is
> > > after
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > >> > > pages*
> > > > > > > > >> > > > in
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > pdf
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > file,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as page 15...
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It simply *does not show* *the
> > > > > > HIGHLIGHT*...
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone has faced this
> > situation
> > > > > > before?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *--Evert*
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Binoy Dalal
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Binoy Dalal
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Binoy Dalal
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Binoy Dalal
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > > >> Binoy Dalal
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Binoy Dalal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Binoy Dalal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Binoy Dalal
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to