Sweet - that's a good point - I ran into that too - I had not run the commit for the last "batch" (I was using SolrJ) and so numbers didn't match until I did.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) Are you sure you don't have duplicates? > 2) All of your records might have been indexed but a new searcher may not > have opened on the updated index yet. Try issuing a commit and see if that > works. > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016, 08:56 cqlangyi, <cqlan...@163.com> wrote: > > > hi there, > > > > > > i have an solr 5.2.1, when i do data import, after the job is done, it's > > shown 165,191 rows processed successfully. > > > > > > but when i query with *:*, the "numFound" shown only 163,349 docs in > index. > > > > > > when i tred to do it again, , it's shown 165,191 rows processed > > successfully. but the *:* query result now is 162,390. > > > > > > no errors in any log, > > > > > > any idea? > > > > > > thank you very much! > > > > > > cq > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 2016-04-05 09:19:48, "Chris Hostetter" <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >: I am not sure how to use "Sort By Function" for Case. > > >: > > >: > |10#40|14#19|33#17|27#6|15#6|19#5|7#2|6#1|29#1|5#1|30#1|28#1|12#0|20#0| > > >: > > >: Can you tell how to fetch 40 when input is 10. > > > > > >Something like... > > > > > > > > >if(termfreq(f,10),40,if(termfreq(f,14),19,if(termfreq(f,33),17,....))))))))))) > > > > > >But i suspect there may be a much better way to achieve your ultimate > goal > > >if you tell us what it is. what do these fields represent? what makes > > >these numeric valuessignificant? do you know which values are > significant > > >when indexing, or do they vary for every query? > > > > > >https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem > > >XY Problem > > > > > >Your question appears to be an "XY Problem" ... that is: you are dealing > > >with "X", you are assuming "Y" will help you, and you are asking about > "Y" > > >without giving more details about the "X" so that we can understand the > > >full issue. Perhaps the best solution doesn't involve "Y" at all? > > >See Also: http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=542341 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-Hoss > > >http://www.lucidworks.com/ > > > -- > Regards, > Binoy Dalal >
