We implemented something similar it sounds to what you are asking but I dont see why you would need to match the original field. Since technically a field that has *software engineer* indexed is matched by a query like "software eng" .... to "software engineer" with the ngrams; which makes the exact phrase is still valid.
The problem we where trying to solve was the exact phrase issue which can be solved with taking in a qs value of 0 (or higher depending on your definition of exactness). Maybe an example would help if there is something I am not understanding. Also your field definitions might help or a example of the schema breakdown similar to the admin analyze page. Nick On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Lasitha Wattaladeniya <watt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to implement a search functionality using solr. Currently I'm > suing edismax parser with ngram fields to do the search against. So far it > works well. > > The question I have is when the user input double quotations to the search, > As the requirement this should match against the original field, not > against the ngram field. > > Currently what I have thought of doing is, identify the double quotations > in the user input and change the query field (qf) according to that (to > ngram field or to the exact field). Isn't there any out of the box solution > for this, I feel like it's a generic requirement and don't want to reinvent > the wheel. Appreciate your comments > > [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6842 > > [2]. > > http://grokbase.com/t/lucene/solr-user/14cbghncvh/different-fields-for-user-supplied-phrases-in-edismax > > Thanks, > > Lasitha Wattaladeniya > > Software Engineer >
