I wonder why {!parent} doesn't have subordinate clause. I suggest to drop
childNo_s:123456 part of child filter just to get something to start from.On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mikhail, > > Thanks for your reply. > I tried this, but it only returns the parent's record and not the child > record. > > http://localhost/solr/collection1/select?q={!parent+ > which%3D%22contentType:parent%22}&fl=*,[child+parentFilter% > 3D$parent_filter+childFilter%3D$child_filter]&parent_ > filter=contentType:parent&child_filter=(contentType: > child+AND+childNo_s:123456) > > > Regards, > Edwin > > > On 9 August 2016 at 18:23, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello Edwin, > > Have you tried to combine q={!parent ..}... &fl=*,[child ...] ? > > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > edwinye...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Would like to check, is it possible to return certain fields from > > parent's > > > record, when we are searching for fields that are only contained in > child > > > records. > > > > > > For example, for this query: > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=childField:123 > > > > > > The child field can only be found in child, so this search will not > > return > > > any parent's record. But if I want to return like says its parent's ID > > > together with the above query, is it possible to be done? > > > > > > I'm using Solr 6.1.0. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Edwin > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
