Thanks for the Pointer Mikhail,
i didn’t ;o i’ve seen it in some tests but i didn’t realize that it might help
(now pretty obvious) .. and now i’m finding all the relevant threads as well.
Thanks again,
Stefan
On September 15, 2016 at 10:10:32 AM, Mikhail Khludnev (m...@apache.org) wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
> Have you tried to add processEmpty:true ?
>
> json.facet={processEmpty:true,"source":{"type":"terms","field":"source","
> domain":{"excludeTags":"source"}}}
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
>
> > I’m not entirely sure i’m describing the correct problem here - for now it
> > looks like the only way it occurs and i hope it’s not misleading any
> > pointers that would be helpful. so in case you think i got it wrong, please
> > say so
> >
> > I have two documents in the index [{"source":"foo"}, {"source":"bar”}]
> > where source is a simple string field (indexed as well as stored, if
> > that’ll matter).
> >
> > Using
> >
> > > ?q=*:*
> > > &fq={!tag=source}source:"meh"
> > > &json.facet={"source":{"type":"terms","field":"source","
> > domain":{"excludeTags":"source"}}}
> >
> > where meh is a value that is not available for source, i get no results
> > (expected) but no facets as well - which is rather unexpected to me. as
> > soon as i go with source:”bar” (or something else that yields at least one
> > record) i’m getting a record back and as well facets.
> >
> > which is why i’ve started of with the idea that there might be a
> > correlation between those things. verifying the situation using the old
> > facet approach i always get the expected facets back, no matter if the
> > result is empty or not.
> >
> > Or isn’t it supposed to work like this anymore and i’m the guy who didn’t
> > get the memo?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Stefan
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
>
