Yup. That works. So does (*:* NOT ...)
Thanks, Alex. SRK
On Monday, September 26, 2016 3:03 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
<arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Try field2:value2 OR (*:* -field1=value1)
There is a magic in negative query syntax that breaks down when it
gets more complex. It's been discussed on the mailing list a bunch of
times, though the discussions are hard to find by title.
Regards,
Alex.
----
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 26 September 2016 at 16:06, Sandeep Khanzode
<sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi,
> If I query for
> -field1=value1 ... I get, say, 100 records
> and if I query for
> field2:value2 ... I may get 200 records
>
> I would assume that if I query for
> -field1:value1 OR field2:value2
>
> ... I should get atleast 100 records (assuming they overlap, if not, upto 300
> records). I am assuming that the default joining is OR.
> But I do not ...
> The result is that I get less than 100. If I didn't know better, I would have
> said that an AND is being done.
>
> I am expecting records that EITHER do NOT contain field1:value1 OR which
> contain field2:value2.
>
> Please let me know what I am missing. Thanks.
>
> SRK
