Ah, yes, the FieldType I used was not the one I needed. I completely missed that. Thank you very much, it's working perfectly now.
thanks, Stefan Oestreicher > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:46 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: query parsing > > Solr/Lucene QueryParser returns a TermQuery for "phrases" > that end up only as a single term. This could happen, for > example, if it was using Solr's "string" field type (which > has effectively no analyzer). > > I'd guess that you'd want to re-analyze TermQuery's? (though > that sound problematic for many cases) Or possibly use your > own SolrQueryParser subclass and override #getFieldQuery. > > Erik > > On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:26 AM, Stefan Oestreicher wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I need to modify the query to search through all fields if > no explicit > > field has been specified. I know there's the dismax handler but I'd > > like to use the standard query syntax. > > I implemented that with my own QParserPlugin and QParser and for > > simple term queries it works great. I'm using the SolrQueryParser > > which I get from the schema to parse the query with an impossible > > field name as the default field and then I rewrite the query > > accordingly. > > Unfortunately this doesn't work with phrase queries, the > > SolrQueryParser always returns a TermQuery instead of a > phrase query. > > > > What am I missing? Is this even a viable approach? > > > > This is a code snippet from a test case (extending > > AbstractSolrTestCase) > > which I used to verify that it's not returning a PhraseQuery: > > > > -----8<----- > > SolrQueryParser parser = > > h.getCore().getSchema().getSolrQueryParser(null); > > Query q = parser.parse("baz \"foo bar\""); assertTrue( q instanceof > > BooleanQuery ); BooleanQuery bq = (BooleanQuery)q; > BooleanClause[] cl > > = bq.getClauses(); assertEquals(2, cl.length); //this > assertion fails > > assertTrue(cl[1].getQuery() instanceof PhraseQuery); > > -----8<----- > > > > I'm using solr 1.3, r685085. > > > > TIA, > > > > Stefan Oestreicher > >
