Vrinda, The expected behavior if parent shard 'shardA' resides on node'1', node'2' ... node'n' and do a SPLITSHARD on it.
the child shards, shardA_0 and shardA_1 will reside on node'1', node'2' ... node'n'. shardA ------- node'1' (leader) & node'2' (replica) after splitshard; shardA ------- node'1' (leader) & node'2' (replica) (INACTIVE) shardA_0 ------ node'1' & node'2' (ACTIVE) shardA_1 ------ node'1' & node'2' (ACTIVE) Any one of them can be a leader and replica for the children nodes. Amrit Sarkar Search Engineer Lucidworks, Inc. 415-589-9269 www.lucidworks.com Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM, vrindavda <vrinda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks I go it. > > But I see that distribution of shards and replicas is not equal. > > For Example in my case : > I had shard 1 and shard2 on Node 1 and their replica_1 and replica_2 on > Node 2. > I did SHARDSPLIT on shard1 to get shard1_0 and shard1_1 such that > and shard1_0_replica0 are created on Node 1 and shard1_0_replica1, > shard1_1_replica1 and shard1_1_replica0 on Node 2. > > Is this expected behavior ? > > Thank you, > Vrinda Davda > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/SPLITSHARD-Working-tp4333876p4333922.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
