Hi Shawn, I forgot that legacy-int-fields were deprecated. Point fields it is then.
Thanks, Dorian On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 5/16/2017 3:33 AM, Dorian Hoxha wrote: > > Has anyone measured which is more efficient/performant between the 2 > > intfields if we don't need to do range-checking ? (precisionStep=0) > > Point field support in Solr is *BRAND NEW*. Very little information is > available yet on the Solr implementation. Benchmarks were done at the > Lucene level, but I do not know what the numbers were. If any Solr > benchmarks were done, which I can't be sure about, I do not know where > the results might be. > > Lucene had Points support long before Solr did. The Lucene developers > felt so strongly about the superiority of the Point implementations that > they completely deprecated the legacy numeric field classes (which is > what Trie classes use) early in the 6.x development cycle, slating them > for removal in 7.0. > > If you wonder about backward compatibility in Solr 7.0 because the > Lucene legacy numerics are disappearing, then you've discovered a > dilemma that we're facing before the 7.0 release. > > Thanks, > Shawn > >
