did you try the rule shard:shard1,port:8983 this ensures that all replicas of shard1 is allocated in the node w/ port 8983.
if it doesn't , it's a bug. Please open aticket On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bernd Fehling <bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > After some analysis it turns out that they compare apples with oranges :-( > > Inside "tryAPermutationOfRules" the rule is called with rules.get() and > the next step is calling rule.compare(), but they don't compare the nodes > against the rule (or rules). They compare the nodes against each other. > > E.g. server1:8983, server2:7574, server1:7574,... > What do you think will happen if comparing server1:8983 against server2:7574 > (and so on)??? > It will _NEVER_ match!!! > > Regards > Bernd > > > Am 23.05.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Bernd Fehling: >> No, that is way off, because: >> 1. you have no "tag" defined. >> shard and replica can be omitted and they will default to wildcard, >> but a "tag" must be defined. >> 2. replica must be an integer or a wildcard. >> >> Regards >> Bernd >> >> Am 23.05.2017 um 01:17 schrieb Damien Kamerman: >>> If you want all the replicas for shard1 on the same port then I think the >>> rule is: 'shard:shard1,replica:port:8983' >>> >>> On 22 May 2017 at 18:47, Bernd Fehling <bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I tried many settings with "Rule-based Replica Placement" on Solr 6.5.1 >>>> and came to the conclusion that it is not working at all. >>>> >>>> My test setup is 6 nodes on 3 servers (port 8983 and 7574 on each server). >>>> >>>> The call to create a new collection is >>>> "http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=boss&; >>>> collection.configName=boss_configs&numShards=3&replicationFactor=2& >>>> maxShardsPerNode=1&rule=shard:shard1,replica:<2,port:8983" >>>> >>>> With "rule=shard:shard1,replica:<2,port:8983" I expect that shard1 has >>>> only nodes with port 8983 _OR_ it shoud fail due to "strict mode" because >>>> the fuzzy operator "~" it not set. >>>> >>>> The result of the call is: >>>> shard1 --> server2:7574 / server1:8983 >>>> shard2 --> server1:7574 / server3:8983 >>>> shard3 --> server2:8983 / server3:7574 >>>> >>>> The expected result should be (at least!!!) shard1 --> server_x:8983 / >>>> server_y:8983 >>>> where "_x" and "_y" can be anything between 1 and 3 but must be different. >>>> >>>> I think the problem is somewhere in "class ReplicaAssigner" with >>>> "tryAllPermutations" >>>> and "tryAPermutationOfRules". >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Bernd >>>> >>> -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul
