You are right about that but in some cases I may need to reindex my data and wanted to avoid deleting the full index so I can still server queries. I thought reindexing same version would be handy or at least to have the flexibility.
On 2 June 2017 at 14:53, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see the difference now between using _version_ vs custom versionField. > Both seems to behave differently. The _version_ field if used allows same > version to be updated and that's the perception I had in mind for custom > versionField. > > My question is why do you want to update the document if same version. > Shouldn't you pass higher version if the doc has changed and that makes the > update to be accepted ? > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Just to confirm again before go too far, are you able to execute these > > examples and see same output given under "Optimistic Concurrency". > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/ > > Updating+Parts+of+Documents#UpdatingPartsofDocuments-In-PlaceUpdates > > > > Let me know which example you fail to get same output as described in. > > > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Sergio García Maroto <marot...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> I had a look to the source code and I see > >> DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessorFactory > >> > >> if (0 < ((Comparable)newUserVersion).compareTo((Comparable) > >> oldUserVersion)) { > >> // log.info("VERSION returning true (proceed with update)" ); > >> return true; > >> } > >> > >> I can't find a way of overwriting same version without changing that > piece > >> of code. > >> Would be possible to add a parameter to the > >> "DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessorFactory" something like > >> "overwrite.same.version=true" > >> so the new code would look like. > >> > >> > >> int compareTo = ((Comparable)newUserVersion).compareTo((Comparable) > >> oldUserVersion); > >> if ( ((overwritesameversion) && 0 <= compareTo) || (0 < compareTo)) { > >> // log.info("VERSION returning true (proceed with update)" ); > >> return true; > >> } > >> > >> > >> Is that thing going to break anyhting? Can i do that change? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Sergio > >> > >> > >> On 2 June 2017 at 10:10, Sergio García Maroto <marot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > I am using 6.1.0. > >> > I tried with two different field types, long and date. > >> > <field name="versionEpoch" type="long" indexed="true" stored="true" > /> > >> > <field name="UpdatedDateSD" type="date" indexed="true" > stored="true"/> > >> > > >> > I am using this configuration on the solrconfig.xml > >> > > >> > <updateRequestProcessorChain default="true"> > >> > <processor class="solr.DocBasedVersionCon > >> straintsProcessorFactory"> > >> > <bool name="ignoreOldUpdates">false</bool> > >> > <str name="versionField">UpdatedDateSD</str> > >> > </processor> > >> > <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > >> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > >> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory"/> > >> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > >> > > >> > i had a look to the wiki page and it says https://cwiki.apache.org/ > >> > confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents > >> > > >> > *Once configured, this update processor will reject (HTTP error code > >> 409) > >> > any attempt to update an existing document where the value of > >> > the my_version_l field in the "new" document is not greater then the > >> value > >> > of that field in the existing document.* > >> > > >> > Do you have any tip on how to get same versions not getting rejected. > >> > > >> > Thanks a lot. > >> > > >> > > >> > On 1 June 2017 at 19:04, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Which version of solr are you using? I tested in 6.0 and if I supply > >> same > >> >> version, it overwrite/update the document exactly as per the wiki > >> >> documentation. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Susheel > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:57 AM, marotosg <marot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks a lot Susheel. > >> >> > I see this is actually what I need. I have been testing it and > >> notice > >> >> the > >> >> > value of the field has to be always greater for a new document to > get > >> >> > indexed. if you send the same version number it doesn't work. > >> >> > > >> >> > Is it possible somehow to overwrite documents with the same > version? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > >> >> > nabble.com/version-Versioning-using-timespan- > tp4338171p4338475.html > >> >> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
