Thanks Amrit. So storage mechanism of parent child documents is limiting the capability of partial update. It would be great to have flawless parent child index support in solr.
On 17-Jul-2017 11:14 PM, "Amrit Sarkar" <sarkaramr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sujay, > > Not really. Parent-child documents are stored in a single block > contiguously. Read more about parent-child relationship at: > https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2/multiple-documents-with-same-doc-id-in- > index-in-solr-cloud-32c072db2164 > > While we perform partial / atomic update, say {"id":"X", > "fieldA":{"set":"Z"}, that particular doc with X will be fetched (all the > "stored" fields), update will be performed and indexed, all happens in > *DistributedUpdateProcessor* internally. So there is no way it will fetch > the child documents along with it. > > I am not sure whether this can be done with current code or it will be > fixed / improved in the future. > > Amrit Sarkar > Search Engineer > Lucidworks, Inc. > 415-589-9269 > www.lucidworks.com > Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Sujay Bawaskar <sujaybawas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Need a help to understand solr parent child document partial update > > behaviour. Can we perform partial update on parent document without > losing > > its chiild documents? My observation is that parent child relationship > > between documents get lost in case partial update is performed on parent. > > Any work around or solution to this issue? > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Sujay P Bawaskar > > M:+91-77091 53669 > > >
