type:value AND (name:america^1+name:state^1+name:united^1) but in reality what you want to do is use the fq parameter with type:value
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:36 PM, OTH <omer.t....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have the following use case: > > I have two fields (among others); one is 'name' and the other is 'type'. > 'Name' is the field I need to search, whereas, with 'type', I need to make > sure that it has a certain value, depending on the situation. Often, when > I search the 'name' field, the search query would have multiple tokens. > Furthermore, each query token needs to have a scoring weight attached to > it. > > However, I'm unable to figure out the syntax which would allow all these > things to happen. > > For example, if I use the following query: > select?q=type:value+AND+name:america^1+name:state^1+name:united^1 > It would only return documents where 'name' includes the token 'america' > (and where type==value). It will totally ignore > "+name:state^1+name:united^1", it seems. > > This does not happen if I omit "type:value+AND+". So, with the following > query: > select?q=name:america^1+name:state^1+name:united^1 > It returns all documents which contain any of the three tokens {america, > state, united}; which is what I need. However, it also returns documents > where type != value; which I can't have. > > If I put "type:value" at the end of the query command, like so: > select?q=name:america^1+name:state^1+name:united^1+AND+type:value > In this case, it will only return documents which contain the "united" > token in the name field (and where type==value). Again, it will totally > ignore "name:america^1+name:state^1", it seems. > > I tried putting an "AND" between everything, like so: > select?q=type:value+AND+name:america^1+AND+name:state^1+AND+name:united^1 > But this, of course, would only return documents which contain all the > tokens {america, state, united}; whereas I need all documents which contain > any of those tokens. > > > If anyone could help me out with how this could be done / what the correct > syntax would be, that would be a huge help. > > Much thanks > Omer >