Hi Yonik, Thanks for your reply.
Will this be solved in the Solr 7.0 version? For now, is there other method which we can do to overcome this issue? Regards, Edwin On 8 August 2017 at 19:56, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is due to function queries currently lacking type information > (this problem will occur anywhere function queries are used and is not > unique to JSON Facet). > Function queries were originally only used in lucene scoring (which > only uses float). > The inner sum(amount1_d,amount2_d) uses SumFloatFunction, hence the > loss of precision. > > One should see the same loss of precision using pseudo-fields with > function queries for example: > q=my_document&fl=id, amount1_d, amount2_d ,sum(amount1_d,amount2_d) > > The JIRA for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6575 > > -Yonik > > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Patrick Chan <pcha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Appreciate if anyone can help raise an issue for the JSON facet sum error > > my staff Edwin raised earlier > > > > but have not gotten any response from the Solr community and developers. > > > > Our production operation is urgently needing this accuracy to proceed as > it > > impacts audit issues. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Dr.Patrick > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > edwinye...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > >> This is the way which I put my JSON facet. > >> > >> totalAmount:"sum(sum(amount1_d,amount2_d))" > >> > >> amount1_d: 69446961 <6944%206961>.2 > >> amount2_d: 0 > >> > >> Result I get: 69446959 <6944%206959>.27 > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Edwin > >> > >> > >> On 25 July 2017 at 20:44, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I'm trying to do a sum of two double fields in JSON Facet. One of the > >> > field has a value of 69446961 <6944%206961>.2, while the other is 0. > > However, when I > >> get > >> > the result, I'm getting a value of 69446959 <6944%206959>.27. This is > > 1.93 lesser than > >> > the original value. > >> > > >> > What could be the reason? > >> > > >> > I'm using Solr 6.5.1. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Edwin > >> > >
