On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:03 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote: > It's due to this (see comments in UnInvertedField):
I have read that. What I don't understand is the difference between 4.x and 6.x. But as you say, Ere seems to be in the process of verifying whether this is simply due to more segments in 6.x. > There's probably a number of ways we can speed this up somewhat: > - optimize how much memory is used to store the term index and use > the savings to store more than every 128th term > - store the terms contiguously in block(s) I'm considering taking a shot at that. A fairly easy optimization would be to replace the BytesRef[] indexedTermsArray with a BytesRefArray. - Toke Eskildsen, Royal Danish Library
