Do you use HttpSolrClient then? On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
> We run SolrJ 4.7.1 with Solr 6.5.1 (16 node cloud). No problems. > > We do not use the cloud-specific client and I’m pretty sure that we don’t > use ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer. The latter is because it doesn’t report > errors properly. > > We do our indexing through the load balancer and let the Solr Cloud > cluster get the right docs to the right shards. That runs at 1 million > docs/minute, so it isn’t worth doing anything fancier. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:05 AM, David Hastings < > hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What about the ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer for solrj? That is what almost > > all of my indexing code is using for solr 5.x, Its been a while since I > > experimented with upgrading but i seem to remember having to go > > to HttpSolrClient and couldnt get the code to compile, so i tabled the > > experiment for a while. eventually I will need to move to solr 6, but > if i > > could keep the same indexing code that would be ideal > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Erick Erickson < > erickerick...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Felix: > >> > >> There's no specific testing that I know of for this issue, it's "best > >> effort". Which means it _should_ work but I can't make promises. > >> > >> Now that said, underlying it all is just HTTP requests going back and > >> forth so I know of no a-priori reasons it wouldn't be fine. It's just > >> "try it and see" though. > >> > >> Best, > >> Erick > >> > >> I'm probably preaching to the choir, but Java 1.7 is two years past > >> the end of support from Oracle, somebody sometime has to deal with > >> upgrading. > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Felix Stanley > >> <felixstan...@globalsources.com> wrote: > >>> Hi there, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We are planning to use SOLR J 5.5.4 to query from SOLR 6.5. > >>> > >>> The reason was that we have to rely on JDK 1.7 at the client and as far > >> as I > >>> know SOLR J 6.x.x only support JDK 1.8. > >>> > >>> I understood that SOLR J generally maintains backwards/forward > >> compatibility > >>> from this article: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Would there though be any exception that we need to take caution of for > >> this > >>> specific version? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks a lot. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Felix Stanley > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------------------- > >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > >>> > >>> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > >> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have > >> received this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and > >> delete this e-mail (including any attachments) from your computer, and > you > >> must not use, disclose to anyone else or copy this e-mail (including any > >> attachments), whether in whole or in part. > >>> > >>> This e-mail and any reply to it may be monitored for security, legal, > >> regulatory compliance and/or other appropriate reasons. > >> > >
