Yes, but that issue seems specific to SolrCloud like I mentioned. We are running Solr in cloud mode and don't have Zookeeper configured
Thanks Sundeep On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sundeep, > > This looks to me like <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9803> / > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10506>, which was fixed in > Solr 7.0. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Sundeep T <sundeep....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > We are running our solr 6.4.2 instance on a single node without > zookeeper. So, we are not using solr cloud. We have been ingesting about > 50k messages per second into this instance spread over 4 cores. > > > > When we looked at the heapdump we see that it has there are around 385 > million instances of VersionBucket objects taking about 8gb memory. This > number seems to grow based on the number of cores into which we are > ingesting data into.PFA a screen cap of heap recording. > > > > Browsing through the jira list we saw a similar issue - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9803 > > > > This issue is recently resolved by Erick. But this issue seems be > specifically tied to SolrCloud mode and Zookeeper. We are not using any of > these. > > > > So, we are thinking this could be another issue. Any one has ideas on > what this could be and if there is a fix for it? > > > > Thanks > > Sundeep > >
