And please define what you mean by "merging is not working". One
parameter is max segments size, which defaults to 5G. Segments
at or near that size are not eligible for merging unless they have
around 50% deleted docs.

Best,
Erick

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Amrit Sarkar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chandru,
>
> Didn't try the above config bu whyt have you defined both "mergePolicy" and
> "mergePolicyFactory"? and pass different values for same parameters?
>
>
> <mergePolicy class="org.apache.lucene.index.TieredMergePolicy">
>>   <int name="maxMergeAtOnce">10</int>
>>   <int name="segmentsPerTier">1</int>
>>         </mergePolicy>
>> <mergePolicyFactory class="org.apache.solr.index.
>> TieredMergePolicyFactory">
>>   <int name="maxMergeAtOnce">10</int>
>>   <int name="segmentsPerTier">10</int>
>> </mergePolicyFactory>
>>
>
>
> Amrit Sarkar
> Search Engineer
> Lucidworks, Inc.
> 415-589-9269
> www.lucidworks.com
> Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Chandru Shanmugasundaram <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The following is my solrconfig.xml
>>
>> <indexConfig>
>>         <writeLockTimeout>1000</writeLockTimeout>
>>     <commitLockTimeout>10000</commitLockTimeout>
>> <maxIndexingThreads>15</maxIndexingThreads>
>> <useCompoundFile>false</useCompoundFile>
>> <ramBufferSizeMB>1024</ramBufferSizeMB>
>> <mergePolicy class="org.apache.lucene.index.TieredMergePolicy">
>>   <int name="maxMergeAtOnce">10</int>
>>   <int name="segmentsPerTier">1</int>
>>         </mergePolicy>
>> <mergePolicyFactory class="org.apache.solr.index.
>> TieredMergePolicyFactory">
>>   <int name="maxMergeAtOnce">10</int>
>>   <int name="segmentsPerTier">10</int>
>> </mergePolicyFactory>
>> <lockType>hdfs</lockType>
>> <deletionPolicy class="solr.SolrDeletionPolicy">
>> <str name="maxCommitsToKeep">1</str>
>> <str name="maxOptimizedCommitsToKeep">0</str>
>> </deletionPolicy>
>>   </indexConfig>
>>
>> Please let me know if should I tweak something above
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Chandru.S
>>

Reply via email to