Radio silence…

Here is a GIST for easy reproduction. Is this by design?

--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com

> 11. jan. 2018 kl. 00:42 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We index several large nested documents. We found that querying the data 
> behaves differently depending on how the documents are indexed.
> 
> To reproduce:
> 
> solr start
> solr create -c nested
> # Index one plain document, “friend" and a nested one, “mother” and 
> “daughter”, in same request:
> curl localhost:8983/solr/nested/update -d ‘
> <add>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="id">friend</field>
>     <field name="type">other</field>
>   </doc>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="id">mother</field>
>     <field name="type">parent</field>
>     <doc>
>       <field name="id">daughter</field>
>       <field name="type">child</field>
>     </doc>
>   </doc>
> </add>'
> 
> # Query for mother’s children using either child transformer or child query 
> parser
> curl 
> "localhost:8983/solr/a/query?q=id:mother&fl=%2A%2C%5Bchild%20parentFilter%3Dtype%3Aparent%5D”
> {
>  "responseHeader":{
>    "zkConnected":true,
>    "status":0,
>    "QTime":4,
>    "params":{
>      "q":"id:mother",
>      "fl":"*,[child parentFilter=type:parent]"}},
>  "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
>      {
>        "id":"mother",
>        "type":["parent"],
>        "_version_":1589249812802306048,
>        "type_str":["parent"],
>        "_childDocuments_":[
>        {
>          "id":"friend",
>          "type":["other"],
>          "_version_":1589249812729954304,
>          "type_str":["other"]},
>        {
>          "id":"daughter",
>          "type":["child"],
>          "_version_":1589249812802306048,
>          "type_str":["child"]}]}]
>  }}
> 
> As you can see, the “friend” got included as a child of “mother”.
> If you index the exact same request, putting “friend” after “mother” in the 
> xml,
> the query works as expected.
> 
> Inspecting the index, everything looks correct, and only “daughter” and 
> “mother” have _root_=mother.
> Is there a rule that you should start a new update request for each type of 
> parent/child relationship
> that you need to index, and not mix them in the same request?
> 
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 

Reply via email to