Thanks I think we'll go for extractOnly cause using a recent version of Tika causes to many dependency issues.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Joris, > I doubt that you can do that. That would require extracting request > handler to support incremental updating and I don’t thing it does. In order > to update existing doc, you would have to extract content and send it as > incrementa update request. > You can still use extracting handler to extract content by sending > extractOnly=true and get extraction results in response, but maybe better > to invoke Tika on client side. > > HTH, > Emir > -- > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > > > > > On 1 Feb 2018, at 11:54, Joris De Smedt <joris.desm...@chapoo.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I'd like to update a single field of an existing document with the > content > > of a file. > > My current setup looks like this: > > > > final File file = new File("path to file"); > > ContentStreamUpdateRequest req = new > > ContentStreamUpdateRequest("/update/extract"); > > req.addContentStream(new ContentStreamBase.FileStream(file)); > > req.setParam("literal.id", id); > > req.setParam("uprefix","ignored_"); > > req.setParam("fmap.content", "content"); > > req.setParam("captureAttr","true"); > > req.setParam("lowernames","true"); > > solrClient.request(req, "collection"); > > solrClient.commit("collection"); > > > > The problem with it is that it overwrites the existing file instead of > > adding a content field. > > Is there a way to solve this? > > -- > > Joris De Smedt > > -- Joris De Smedt
