On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Wei <weiwan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks all! It's really great learning. A bit off the topic, after I
> enabled facet.method = uif in solr cloud, the faceting performance is
> actually much worse than the original fc( ~1000 ms with uif vs ~200 ms
> with fc). My cloud has 8 shards with 6 replicas in each shard. I do see
> that fieldValueCache is getting utilized. Any reason uif could be so
I haven't seen that before. Are you sure it's not the first time
faceting on a field? uif has big upfront cost, but is usually faster
once that cost has been paid.
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Great, thanks for tracking that down!
>> It's interesting that a mincount of 0 disables uif processing in the
>> first place. IIRC, it's only the hash-based method (as opposed to
>> array-based) that can't return zero counts.
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Alessandro Benedetti
>> <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote:
>> > *Update* : This has been actually already solved by Hoss.
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11711 and this is the Pull
>> > Request : https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/279/files
>> > This should go live with 7.3
>> > Cheers
>> > -----
>> > ---------------
>> > Alessandro Benedetti
>> > Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
>> > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
>> > --
>> > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html