Couldn't the same information on that page be put into the Solr Ref Guide? I mean, if that's what we recommend, it should be documented officially that it's what we recommend.
I mean, is anyone surprised people keep stumbling over this? Shawn's wiki page doesn't point to the Ref Guide (instead pointing at other wiki pages that are out of date) and the Ref Guide doesn't point to that page. So half the info is in our "official" place but the real story is in another place, one we alternately tell people to sometimes ignore but sometimes keep up to date? Even I'm confused. On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:41 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! now I can just record the URL and then paste it in ;) > > Who knows, maybe people will see it first too! > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > > W00t! Thank you, Shawn! > > > > The "don't use ERH in production" response comes up frequently enough > >> that I have created a wiki page we can use for responses: > >> > >> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/RecommendCustomIndexingWithTika > >> > >> Tim, you are extremely well-qualified to expand and correct this page. > >> Erick may be interested in making adjustments also. The flow of the page > >> feels a little bit awkward to me, but I'm not sure how to improve it. > >> > >> If the page name is substandard, feel free to rename. I've already > >> renamed it once! I searched for an existing page like this before I > >> started creating it. I did put a link to the new page on the > >> ExtractingRequestHandler page. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shawn > >> > >> >
