hey guys. preeti: good thought, but this was something we were already aware of and had accounted for. thanks tho!
shawn: at first, no. we rsynced data up after running it through the migration tool. we'd gotten errors when using WDF so updated all instances of it to WDGF (and subsequently added FlattenGraphFilterFactory to each index analyzer that used WDGF to avoid errors). the sow seems to be the key here. adding that to the query url dropped me from +19k to 62 results lol. 'subtle' is a not so subtle understatement in this case! i'm a big fan of finally being able to not be driven batty by the analysis vs. query results though, so looking forward to playing w that some more. for our immediate purposes, however, i think this solves it! -- John Blythe On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:35 AM Preeti Bhat <preeti.b...@shoregrp.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > Please check the solrQueryParser option, it was removed in 7.4 version, so > you will need to provide <str name="q.op">AND</str> in solrconfig.xml or > give the q.op option while querying to solve this problem. By default solr > makes it an "OR" operation leading to too many results. > > Old Way: In Managed-schema or schema.xml > <solrQueryParser defaultOperator="AND"/> > > New Way: in solrconfig.xml > > <initParams > path="/update/**,/query,/select,/tvrh,/elevate,/spell,/browse"> > <lst name="defaults"> > <str name="q.op">AND</str> > </lst> > </initParams> > > > Thanks and Regards, > Preeti Bhat > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Blythe [mailto:johnbly...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 8:02 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: 6.x to 7.x differences > > hi, all. > > we recently migrated to cloud. part of that migration jumped us from 6.1 > to 7.4. > > one example query between our old solr instance and our new cloud instance > produces 42 results and 19k results. > > the analyzer is the same aside from WordDelimiterFilterFactory moving over > to the graph variation of it and the lucene parser moving from 6.1 to 7.4 > obviously. > > i've used the analysis tool in solr admin to try to determine the > difference between the two. i'm seeing the same output between index and > query results yet when actually running the queries have that huge > divergence of results. > > i'm left scratching my head at this point. i'm guessing it's from the > lucene parser? hoping to get some clarity from you guys! > > thanks! > > -- > John Blythe > > NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS: This communication may contain confidential and/or > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have > received this communication in error) please notify the sender and > it-supp...@shoregrp.com immediately, and destroy this communication. Any > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this > communication is strictly forbidden. Any views or opinions presented in > this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent > those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and > any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no > liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. > > >
