Please see inline...
Deepak "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan" +91 73500 12833 deic...@gmail.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool "Plant a Tree, Go Green" Make In India : http://www.makeinindia.com/home On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:21 PM Sofiya Strochyk <s...@interlogic.com.ua> wrote: > My swappiness is set to 10, swap is almost not used (used space is on > scale of a few MB) and there is no swap IO. > > There is disk IO like this, though: > > https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/43lGfj.png > https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/T3u9oY.png > ****** The time for the data is too short. Can you provide for larger timeframes? ****** > > However CPU iowait is still zero, so not sure if the disk io is > introducing any kind of delay... > > ****** Can you provide graphs for cpu iowait too? (For large timeframes) ****** > On 30.10.18 10:21, Deepak Goel wrote: > > Yes. Swapping from disk to memory & vice versa > > > Deepak > "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are > treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan" > > +91 73500 12833 > deic...@gmail.com > > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool > > "Plant a Tree, Go Green" > > Make In India : http://www.makeinindia.com/home > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:24 PM Sofiya Strochyk <s...@interlogic.com.ua> > wrote: > >> Could you please clarify what is memory disk layer? Do you mean swapping >> from memory to disk, reading from disk to memory, or something else? >> >> On 29.10.18 17:20, Deepak Goel wrote: >> >> I would then suspect performance is choking in memory disk layer. can you >> please check the performance? >> >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, 20:30 Sofiya Strochyk, <s...@interlogic.com.ua> wrote: >> >>> Hi Deepak and thanks for your reply, >>> >>> On 27.10.18 10:35, Deepak Goel wrote: >>> >>> >>> Last, what is the nature of your request. Are the queries the same? Or >>> they are very random? Random queries would need more tuning than if the >>> queries the same. >>> >>> The search term (q) is different for each query, and filter query terms >>> (fq) are repeated very often. (so we have very little cache hit ratio for >>> query result cache, and very high hit ratio for filter cache) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sofiia Strochyk * >>> >>> >>> s...@interlogic.com.ua >>> [image: InterLogic] >>> www.interlogic.com.ua >>> >>> [image: Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/InterLogicOfficial> >>> [image: >>> LinkedIn icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/interlogic> >>> >> >> -- >> >> *Sofiia Strochyk * >> >> >> s...@interlogic.com.ua >> [image: InterLogic] >> www.interlogic.com.ua >> >> [image: Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/InterLogicOfficial> >> [image: >> LinkedIn icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/interlogic> >> > > -- > > *Sofiia Strochyk * > > > s...@interlogic.com.ua > [image: InterLogic] > www.interlogic.com.ua > > [image: Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/InterLogicOfficial> [image: > LinkedIn icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/interlogic> >
