Thanks for your thoughts, Shawn. Are you a developer on SOLR?
Anyway, the configuration (solrconfig.xml) was provided by search_api_solr
(Drupal 7 module) and is untouched. You can find it here:
https://cgit.drupalcode.org/search_api_solr/tree/solr-conf/7.x/solrconfig.xml?h=7.x-1.x
Thank you for pointing out the capital E on echoParams. I re-ran the query, but
it doesn't change the output (at least on the surface of it).
> On Jan 2, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2018 8:57 AM, Kay Wrobel wrote:
>> Here are my log entries:
>>
>> SOLR 7.x (non-working)
>> 2018-12-28 15:36:32.786 INFO (qtp1769193365-20) [ x:collection1]
>> o.a.s.c.S.Request [collection1] webapp=/solr path=/select
>> params={q=ac6023*&qf=tm_field_product^21.0&qf=tm_title_field^8.0&EchoParams=all&rows=10&wt=xml&debugQuery=true}
>> hits=0 status=0 QTime=2
>>
>> SOLR 4.x (working)
>> INFO - 2018-12-28 15:43:41.938; org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore;
>> [collection1] webapp=/solr path=/select
>> params={q=ac6023*&qf=tm_field_product^21.0&qf=tm_title_field^8.0&EchoParams=all&rows=10&wt=xml&debugQuery=true}
>> hits=32 status=0 QTime=8
>
> Neither of those requests includes anything that would change from the
> default lucene parser to edismax. The logging *would* include all parameters
> set by the configuration as well as those specified on the URL.
>
> You ought to try adding "defType=edismax" to the URL parameters, or to the
> definition of "/select" in solrconfig.xml.
>
>> EchoParams=all did not show anything different in the resulting XML from
>> SOLR 7.x.
>
> The parameter requested was "echoParams" and not "EchoParams". There *is* a
> difference, and the latter will not work.
>
>> I found out something curious yesterday. When I try to force the Standard
>> query parser on SOLR 7.x using the same query, but adding "defType=lucene"
>> at the beginning, SOLR 7 raises a SolrException with this message: "analyzer
>> returned too many terms for multiTerm term: ac6023"
>
> I do not know what this is about. I did find the message in the source code.
> I don't understand the low-level code, and it looks to me like that section
> of code will *always* throw an exception, which isn't very useful.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
--
The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for
the addressee(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If
you are not an intended recipient, you may not print, save or otherwise
store the e-mail or any of the contents thereof in electronic or physical
form, nor copy, use or disseminate the information contained in the email.
If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender of this
email immediately.
