Andrew, please create a JIRA issue - in my opinion this is a bug not a feature, 
or at least something that needs clarification.

> On 27 Jun 2019, at 23:56, Andrew Kettmann <andrew.kettm...@evolve24.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I found the issue. Autoscaling seems to silently ignore rules (at least 
> sysprop rules). Example rule:
> 
> 
> {'set-policy': {'sales-uat': [{'node': '#ANY',
>                               'replica': '<2',
>                               'strict': 'false'},
>                              {'replica': '#ALL',
>                               'strict': 'true',
>                               'sysprop.HELM_CHART': 'foo'}]}}
> 
> 
> Two cases will get the sysprop rule ignored:
> 
>  1.  No nodes have a HELM_CHART system property defined
>  2.  No nodes have the value "foo" for the HELM_CHART system property
> 
> 
> If you have SOME nodes that have -DHELM_CHART=foo, then it will fail if it 
> cannot satisfy another strict rule. So sysprop autoscaling rules appear to be 
> unable to be strict on their own it appears.
> 
> 
> Hopefully this can solve some issues for other people as well.
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Kettmann
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 1:04:21 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr 7.7.2 - Autoscaling in new cluster ignoring sysprop rules, 
> possibly all rules
> 
> 
> Using docker 7.7.2 image
> 
> 
> Solr 7.7.2 on new Znode on ZK. Created the chroot using solr zk mkroot.
> 
> 
> Created a policy:
> 
> {'set-policy': {'banana': [{'replica': '#ALL',
>                            'sysprop.HELM_CHART': 'notbanana'}]}}
> 
> 
> No errors on creation of the policy.
> 
> 
> I have no nodes that have that value for the system property "HELM_CHART", I 
> have nodes that contain "banana" and "rulesos" for that value only.
> 
> 
> I create the collection with a call to the /admin/collections:
> 
> {'action': 'CREATE',
> 'collection.configName': 'project-solr-7',
> 'name': 'banana',
> 'numShards': '2',
> 'policy': 'banana',
> 'replicationFactor': '2'}
> 
> 
> and it creates the collection without an error. Which what I expected was the 
> collection creation to fail. This is the behavior I had seen in the past, but 
> after tearing down and recreating the cluster in a higher environment, it 
> does not appear to function.
> 
> 
> Is there some prerequisite before policies will be respected? The .system 
> collection is in place as expected, and I am not seeing anything in the logs 
> on the overseer to suggest any problems.
> 
> [https://storage.googleapis.com/e24-email-images/e24logonotag.png]<https://www.evolve24.com>
>  Andrew Kettmann
> DevOps Engineer
> P: 1.314.596.2836
> [LinkedIn]<https://linkedin.com/company/evolve24> [Twitter] 
> <https://twitter.com/evolve24>  [Instagram] 
> <https://www.instagram.com/evolve_24>
> 
> evolve24 Confidential & Proprietary Statement: This email and any attachments 
> are confidential and may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
> or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. It is intended for the use of 
> the recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you 
> have received this communication in error, please do not read, print, copy, 
> retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Please delete this 
> email and attachments, without reading, printing, copying, forwarding or 
> saving them, and notify the Sender immediately by reply email. No 
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any transmission in error.

Reply via email to