Thanks, Jan. The issue is created here - https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/289
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:13 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > I poked around a bit and ended up reading this thead > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320 < > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320> > Appears that the ‘openjdk’ official docker image is NOT the adoptopenjdk > disto, but a RedHat-build binary build of the latest official openJDK > project source code from upstream. > > The reason that the URL referenced in openjdk Dockerfile < > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/1b6e2ef66a086f47315f5d05ecf7de3dae7413f2/11/jdk/Dockerfile#L36> > seems to have AdoptOpenJDK in it is simply because that project has agreed > to host upstream binaries as well as their own, see > https://adoptopenjdk.net/upstream.html < > https://adoptopenjdk.net/upstream.html> > > So to summarize: > > 1) Solr’s official image uses openjdk docker images > 2) openjdk docker image uses a RedHat-built «upstream» build of Java > 3) This means that we are NOT using AdoptOpenJDK, but «Oracle» openjdk, > although not built and released by Oracle > > This is somewhat messy. > > In my opinion we should switch docker-solr to using > adoptopenjdk:11-jre-hotspot as base image. > Reason I don’t feel like going the Corretto path is that Corretto uses > AmazonLinux which is RPM based, and they support fewer versions/arch than > AdoptOpenJDK <https://adoptopenjdk.net/>. > > Please open an issue in the docker-solr project and we’ll continue > discussion there. > > Jan > > > 31. jan. 2020 kl. 23:29 skrev Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org > >: > > > > > > : Link to the issue was helpful. > > : > > : Although, when I take a look at Dockerfile for any Solr version from > here > > : https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr, the very first line says > > : FROM openjdk...It > > : does not say FROM adoptopenjdk. Am I missing something? > > > > Ahhh ... I have no idea, But at least now I better understand your > > concern. > > > > I would suggest opening an issue / PR in the github:docker-solr repo ... > > there are plans to eventually officially move managment of docker-solr > > into the Apache Lucene/Solr project, but for now it's an independent > > packaging effort... > > > > https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/ > > https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/276 > > > > ...in the meantime: If you can't use openjdk, then as far as i > understand > > how docker images work, you'd need to build your own using a patched > > Dockerfile. > > > > > > > > -Hoss > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ > >
