Thanks, Mikhail for Reply.
One more question here:
Lets say xml is like this:
<add>
<doc>
<field name="id">4</field>
<field name="title">Regular Shirt</field>
<field name="doc_type">Parent</field>
<field name="color">Black</field>
</doc>
<doc>
<field name="id">8</field>
<field name="title">Solid Rug</field>
<field name="doc_type">Parent</field>
<field name="pattern">Solid</field>
</doc>
<doc>
<field name="id">1</field>
<field name="title">Regular color Shirts</field>
<field name="doc_type">Parent</field>
<field name="items">
<doc>
<field name="id">2</field>
<field name="doc_type">Child</field>
<field name="pcs_color">Red</field>>
</doc>
<doc>
<field name="id">3</field>
<field name="doc_type">Child</field>
<field name="color">Blue</field>>
</doc>
</field>
</doc>
<doc>
<field name="id">5</field>
<field name="title">Rugs</field>
<field name="doc_type">Parent</field>
<field name="items">
<doc>
<field name="id">6</field>
<field name="doc_type">Child</field>
<field name="pattern">Abstract</field>
</doc>
<doc>
<field name="id">7</field>
<field name="doc_type">Child</field>
<field name="pattern">Printed</field>
</doc>
</field>
</doc>
</add>
Now i want to write a query which fetched all items [with child ->1,5 and
without child -> 4,8] with color:red, title having shirt
here is query
/solr/test/select?q={!parent%20which=doc_type:Parent%20score=max}%20%20{!boost%20b=100.0%20}color:Red%20{!dismax%20qf=title%20v=%27Regular%27%20score=total}&fl=id,product_class_type,title,score,color&wt=json
<http://localhost:8983/solr/test/select?q=%7B!parent%20which=doc_type:Parent%20score=max%7D%20%20%7B!boost%20b=100.0%20%7Dpcs_color:Red%20%7B!dismax%20qf=title%20v=%27Regular%27%20score=total%7D&fl=id,product_class_type,title,score,pcs_color&wt=json>Error: "msg": "Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=4, class org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionSumScorer", I think docId 4 is matching with query but as this is a parent document, solr is throwing error. Is this kind of schema supported in solr 7.6 [mix of child-free and nested document] On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 5:24 PM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > You may try. Content-type should be absolutely the same across parents and > child-free. It may work now. > Earlier, mixing blocks and childfrees in one index wasn't supported. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:57 AM Gajendra Dadheech <gajju3...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That extra s was intentional, should have added a better name. > > > > So ideally we shouldn't have childfree and blocks together while > indexing? > > Or in the whole index they shouldn't be together, i.e. We should have > > atleast one child doc for all if any of doc has one? > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:24 PM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Hello, Gajendra. > > > Pics doesn't come through mailing list. > > > May it caused by unnecessary s <field name="content_type">*s* > > > parentDocument</field>? > > > At least earlier mixing childfrees and blocks wasn't allowed, and > caused > > > some troubles. Usually, child stub used to keep childfrees in the > index. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:22 AM Gajendra Dadheech <gajju3...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > i want to ingest below documents, where there is a mix of nested and > > > > un-nested documents: > > > > <add> > > > > <doc> > > > > <field name="id">5</field> > > > > <field name="_root_">5</field> > > > > <field name="title">5Solr adds block join support</field> > > > > <field name="content_type">sparentDocument</field> > > > > </doc> > > > > <doc> > > > > <field name="id">1</field> > > > > <field name="_root_">1</field> > > > > <field name="title">Solr adds block join support</field> > > > > <field name="content_type">parentDocument</field> > > > > <doc> > > > > <field name="id">2</field> > > > > <field name="_root_">1</field> > > > > <field name="comments">SolrCloud supports it too!</field> > > > > <field name="content_type">childDocument</field> > > > > </doc> > > > > </doc> > > > > <doc> > > > > <field name="id">3</field> > > > > <field name="_root_">3</field> > > > > <field name="title">New Lucene and Solr release is out</field> > > > > <field name="content_type">parentDocument</field> > > > > <doc> > > > > <field name="id">4</field> > > > > <field name="_root_">4</field> > > > > <field name="comments">Lots of new features</field> > > > > <field name="content_type">childDocument</field> > > > > </doc> > > > > </doc> > > > > </add> > > > > > > > > > > > > Output of block join query after ingesting above docs: > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > > > > > So doc id 5 is getting linked to doc id 1. Is this expected > behavior, I > > > > believ Id-5 should be a different document tree. > > > > > > > > Shall I Ingest them in some order ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely yours > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev >
