Is your concern that the Solr explain functionality is slower than Endecas?
Or harder to understand/interpret?

If the latter, I might recommend http://splainer.io as one solution

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:52 PM Webster Homer <
[email protected]> wrote:

> My company is working on a new website. The old/current site is powered by
> Endeca. The site under development is powered by Solr (currently 7.7.2)
>
> Out of the box, Endeca provides the capability to show how a query was
> matched in the search. The business users like this functionality, in solr
> this functionality is an expensive debug option. Is there another way to
> get this information from a query?
>
> Webster Homer
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to
> any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please
> notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment
> from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this
> message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages
> resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and
> any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does
> not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted
> therewith.
>
>
>
> Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, French,
> Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.
>


-- 
*Doug Turnbull **| CTO* | OpenSource Connections
<http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983
Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull>; Contributor: *AI
Powered Search <http://aipoweredsearch.com>*
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
of whether attachments are marked as such.

Reply via email to