Have you gone through http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
SolrPerformanceFactors ?
Can you explain a little more about your testcase, maybe even share
code? I only know a little PHP, but maybe someone else who is better
versed might spot something.
On Oct 30, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH wrote:
Mark Miller schrieb:
Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH wrote:
Mark Miller schrieb:
Right now I am stress testing the performence and sending 2500
search
request via JSON protocol and from my PHPUnit testcase.
All search reuqest are different so caching don´t do it for me.
Right now our old Lucene-JSPs are avout 4 times faster than my
SOLR
Sollution :-(
Well, with Lucene it is an API call in the same JVM in the same
web
application. With Solr, you are making HTTP calls across the
network,
serializing requests and de-serializing responses. So the
comparison is not
exactly apples to apples.
Look at what Solr offers -- replication, caching, plugins etc.
Will you
really need to go over 2500 requests per second? Do you need to
be concerned
with performance above and beyond that? Will it be easier to
scale out to
more boxes?
And have you tried solrj without http?
Right now I am using this php classes to send and receiver my
requests :
- Apache_Solr_Service.php
- Responce.php
It has the advantage that I don´t need to write extra JSP oder
JAVA code...
Greets -Ralf-
I think it will have the disadvantage of being a lot slower though...
How were you handling things with Lucene? You must have used Java
then? If you even want to get close to that performance I think you
need to use non http embedded solr.
Okay okay :-) I am writing a new JSP Handler for my requests as we
speak :-) I really hope performence will be better than with
{wt=javabin} ....
Greets -Ralf-
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Boot Camp Training Nov. 3-4, 2008, ApacheCon US New Orleans.
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
