It looks like cache warming is taking about 12 seconds.  It sounds like you 
need to see if performance is bad during warming, or right after warming (and 
right after the new searcher gets exposed to queries).

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch



----- Original Message ----
> From: oleg_gnatovskiy <oleg_gnatovs...@citysearch.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 1:07:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Query Performance while updating teh index
> 
> 
> Here’s what we have on one of the data slaves for the autowarming.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
> 
> INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main
> 
>       
> filterCache{lookups=351993,hits=347055,hitratio=0.98,inserts=8332,evictions=0,size=8245,warmupTime=215,cumulative_lookups=2837676,cumulative_hits=2766551,cumulative_hitratio=0.97,cumulative_inserts=72050,cumulative_evictions=0}
> 
> Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
> 
> INFO: autowarming result for searc...@3f32ca2b main
> 
>       
> filterCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=1000,evictions=0,size=1000,warmupTime=317,cumulative_lookups=2837676,cumulative_hits=2766551,cumulative_hitratio=0.97,cumulative_inserts=72050,cumulative_evictions=0}
> 
> Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
> 
> INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main
> 
>       
> queryResultCache{lookups=5309,hits=5223,hitratio=0.98,inserts=422,evictions=0,size=421,warmupTime=4628,cumulative_lookups=77802,cumulative_hits=77216,cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=424,cumulative_evictions=0}
> 
> --
> 
> Dec 12, 2008 8:46:07 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
> 
> INFO: autowarming result for searc...@3f32ca2b main
> 
>       
> queryResultCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=421,evictions=0,size=421,warmupTime=5536,cumulative_lookups=77804,cumulative_hits=77218,cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=424,cumulative_evictions=0}
> 
> Dec 12, 2008 8:46:07 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
> 
> INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main
> 
>       
> documentCache{lookups=87216,hits=86686,hitratio=0.99,inserts=570,evictions=0,size=570,warmupTime=0,cumulative_lookups=1270773,cumulative_hits=1268318,cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=2455,cumulative_evictions=0}
> 
> Dec 12, 2008 8:46:07 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm
> 
> INFO: autowarming result for searc...@3f32ca2b main
> 
>       
> documentCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=0,evictions=0,size=0,warmupTime=0,cumulative_lookups=1270773,cumulative_hits=1268318,cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=2455,cumulative_evictions=0}
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> This is our current values after I’ve messed with them a few times trying to
> get better performance.
> 
> 
> 
>     
> 
>       class="solr.LRUCache"
> 
>       size="30000"
> 
>       initialSize="15000"
> 
>       autowarmCount="1000"/>
> 
>     
> 
>       class="solr.LRUCache"
> 
>       size="60000"
> 
>       initialSize="30000"
> 
>       autowarmCount="50000"/>
> 
>     
> 
>       class="solr.LRUCache"
> 
>       size="200000"
> 
>       initialSize="125000"
> 
>       autowarmCount="0"/>
> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Query-Performance-while-updating-the-index-tp20452835p20980669.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to