But its deprecated (??) -Rupert
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Rupert, > > You could use the SpellCheck*Handler* to achieve this. > > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Rupert Fiasco <rufia...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 2:47:19 PM > Subject: Issuing just a spell check query > > The docs for the SpellCheckComponent say > > "The SpellCheckComponent is designed to provide inline spell checking > of queries without having to issue separate requests." > > I would like to issue just a spell check query, I dont care about it > being inline and piggy-backing off a normal search query. > > How would I achieve this? > > I tried monkeying with making a new requestHandler but using class = > "solr.SearchHandler" always tries to do a normal search. > > I succeeded in adding inline spell checking to the default request > handler by *adding* > > <arr name="last-components"> > <str>spellcheck</str> > </arr> > > to its requestHandler config - I would like to *remove* the default > search component - maybe by making a new request handler which just > does spell checking? > > Is something like this possible? > > > > <requestHandler name="/spellcheck" class="solr.SearchHandler"> > <!-- default values for query parameters --> > <lst name="defaults"> > <str name="spellcheck.count">5</str> > </lst> > > <arr name="first-components"> > <str>spellcheck</str> > </arr> > > <!-- remove default search component --> > <arr name="remove-components"> > <str>default</str> > </arr> > > </requestHandler> > > > > > > Now, I can sort of achieve what I want by in fact a normal search but > then using a dummy value for my "q" parameter (for me "00000000000000" > works) and then I get no search docs back, but I do get the spell > suggestions I want, driven by the "spellcheck.q" parameter. > > But this seems very hacky and Solr is still having to run a search > against my dummy value. > > A roundabout way of asking: how can I fire off *just* a spell check query? > > Thanks in advance > -Rupert >
