Thanks Otis, Is it possible to get my hands on the ability in lucene utilizing patches before it is released to the public? (sorry to ask) - How close is it in the source code if I didn't care about the documentation/packaging/etc..? So from what it sounds like, this would be a realtime store(with great search) that could be used instead of a database or in conjunction? Is it wrong to say it's similar to bigtable from google in keeping realtime data in a non relational way but with a better search?
Thanks On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com > wrote: > Michael, > > The short answer is that Solr is not there yet, but will be. Expect to see > real-time search in Lucene first, then in Solr. > We have a case study about real-time search with Lucene in the upcoming > Lucene in Action 2, but a more tightly integrated real-time search will be > added to Lucene down the road (and then Solr). > > In the mean time you can use the trick of one large and less frequently > updated core and one small and more frequently updated core + distributed > search across them. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Michael Austin <mausti...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2009 1:02:43 PM > Subject: Realtime Searching.. > > I need to find a solution for our current social application. It's low > traffic now because we are early on.. However I'm expecting and want to be > prepaired to grow. We have messages of different "types" that are > aggregated into one stream. Each of these message types have much different > data so that our main queries have a few unions and many joins. I know > that > Solr would work great for searching but we need a realtime system > (twitter-like) to view user updates. I'm not interested in a few minutes > delay; I need something that will be fast updating and searchable and have > n > columns per record/document. Can solor do this? what is Ocean? > > Thanks >
