I tried sorting using a function query instead of the Lucene sort and found no change in performance. I wonder if Lance's results are related to something specific to his deployment? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-%22dead-zone%22-due-to-garbage-collection-tp21588427p21922851.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" due to garbag... Walter Underwood
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" due to g... wojtekpia
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" due ... Walter Underwood
- RE: Performance "dead-zone" due ... Feak, Todd
- RE: Performance "dead-zone" ... Renaud Waldura
- RE: Performance "dead-zone&qu... wojtekpia
- Re: Performance "dead-zo... Lance Norskog
- Re: Performance "dea... wojtekpia
- Re: Performance "dea... Yonik Seeley
- Re: Performance "dea... wojtekpia
- Re: Performance "dea... wojtekpia
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" due to garbag... Alexander Ramos Jardim
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" due to g... wojtekpia
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" due ... Alexander Ramos Jardim
- RE: Performance "dead-zone" due ... Feak, Todd
- Re: Performance "dead-zone" ... Walter Underwood
- Re: Performance "dead-zone&qu... wojtekpia
- RE: Performance "dead-zo... Feak, Todd
- RE: Performance "dead-zone" due to garbag... Feak, Todd