The you should consider replicating the index to the local intranet
and still run that it as a separate app.
Will it be the same master-slave replication?? If the master is
multicore, can I specifically replicate an index of a certain core ? Thanks
for the help.
2009/8/7 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com>
> The you should consider replicating the index to the local intranet
> and still run that it as a separate app.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Ninad Raut<hbase.user.ni...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The remote web app will be accessing the Solr server via internet. Its
> not a
> > intranet setup.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> About the first option, caches are more effective with more traffic, so
> ten
> >> front end servers using three Solr servers will have better caching and
> >> probably better overall performance than having separate search on all
> ten
> >> servers. You can even put an HTTP cache in there and get better caching.
> >>
> >> Cached HTTP responses are usually faster than accessing disc locally.
> >>
> >> You say you have a "remote web application". How remote? If the indexes
> are
> >> big, then copying them to a remote location is a lot of traffic.
> >>
> >> wunder
> >>
> >> On Aug 6, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Ninad Raut wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Noble,
> >>> Can you explain a bit more on how to use Solr "out of the box". I am
> >>> looking at ways to design the UI for remote application quickly and
> with
> >>> less problems.
> >>> Also could you elaborate more on what can go wrong with the first
> option?
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> 2009/8/6 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Ninad Raut<
> hbase.user.ni...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> I have a search engine on Solr. Also I have a remote web application
> >>>>>
> >>>> which
> >>>>
> >>>>> will be using the Solr Indexes for search.
> >>>>> I have three scenarios:
> >>>>> 1) Transfer the Indexes to the Remote Application.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - This will reduce load on the actual solr server and make seraches
> >>>>> faster.
> >>>>> - Need to write some code to transfer the index
> >>>>> - Need to double my effort to update,merge,optimize index
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2)Use HTTP GET
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Will increase load on the Solr server
> >>>>> - No extra code needed for transfer
> >>>>>
> >>>> This by far is the best solution. ecause you do not have to do any
> >>>> work at all. It all works out of the box and that is what everyone
> >>>> uses
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3) Embedded Serach
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Use SolrJ for querying
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I want to know which is the best approach.
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Ninad Raut.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------------
> >>>> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>
