Thanks for the reply Yonik! I'm using the nightly from 2009-08-20, so its a rather fresh build. And by comparing the schema with the one im using now I had made a mistake when defining the field. By examining the most recent build, i noticed that the normal date field is defined as follows: <fieldType name="date" class="solr.TrieDateField" omitNorms="true" precisionStep="0" positionIncrementGap="0"/> (its actually a TrieDateField? does this mean that we are moving away from the standard SolrDateField ?) and that the tdate is specified as follows: <fieldType name="tdate" class="solr.TrieDateField" omitNorms="true" precisionStep="6" positionIncrementGap="0"/> I'll update my schema definitions and reindex:) Guess that pretty much will solve my problems. Thanks! Aleks
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote: > I can't reproduce any problem. > > Are you using a recent nightly build? > See the example schema of a recent nightly build for the correct way > to define a Trie based field - the article / blog may be out of date. > > Here's what I used to test the example data: > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=manufacturedate_dt:[NOW/DAY-4YEAR%20TO%20NOW/DAY] > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Aleksander > Stensby<aleksander.sten...@integrasco.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > after reading Grant's article about TrieRange capabilities on the lucid > blog > > I did some experimenting, but I have some trouble with the tdate type and > I > > was hoping that you guys could point me in the right direction. > > So, basically I index a regular solr date field and use that for sorting > and > > range queries today. For experimenting I added tdate field, indexing it > with > > the same data as in my other date field, but I'm obviously doing > something > > wrong here, because the results coming back are completely different... > > the definitions in my schema: > > <field name="datetime" type="date" indexed="true" stored="false" > > omitNorms="true"/> > > <field name="tdatetime" type="tdate" indexed="true" stored="false"/> > > > > so if I do a query on my test index: > > q=datetime:[NOW/DAY-1YEAR TO NOW/DAY] > > i get numFound="1031524" (don't worry about the ordering yet).. > > then, if I do the following on my trie date field: > > q=tdatetime:[NOW/DAY-1YEAR TO NOW/DAY] > > i get numFound="0" > > Where did I go wrong? (And yes, both fields are indexed with the exactly > > same data...) > > Thanks for any guidance here! > > Cheers, > > Aleks > > > > -- > > Aleksander M. Stensby > > Lead Software Developer and System Architect > > Integrasco A/S > > www.integrasco.com > > http://twitter.com/Integrasco > > http://facebook.com/Integrasco > > > > Please consider the environment before printing all or any of this e-mail > > > -- Aleksander M. Stensby Lead Software Developer and System Architect Integrasco A/S www.integrasco.com http://twitter.com/Integrasco http://facebook.com/Integrasco Please consider the environment before printing all or any of this e-mail
