I use DOM. Honestly, I haven't run any perf tests, it all just runs well enough for me. Then again, my documents and resultsets are typically small (~1KB docs and ~50 docs per resultset). How big are your documents?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, wojtekpia <wojte...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I was thinking of going this route too because I've found that parsing XML > result sets using XmlDocument + XPath can be very slow (up to a few > seconds) > when requesting ~100 documents. Are you getting good performance parsing > large result sets? Are you using SAX instead of DOM? > > Thanks, > Wojtek > > > mausch wrote: > > > > It's one of my pending issues for SolrNet ( > > http://code.google.com/p/solrnet/issues/detail?id=71 ) > > I've looked at the code, it doesn't seem terribly complex to port to C#. > > It > > would be kind of cumbersome to test it though. > > I just didn't implement it yet because I'm getting good enough > performance > > with XML (and other people as well: > > http://groups.google.com/group/solrnet/msg/4de8224a33279906 ) > > > > Cheers, > > Mauricio > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/javabin-in-.NET--tp26321914p26323001.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
