Opened JIRA issues:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1584
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1587


--
Asaf Ary

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, these are both bugs. SolrJ should do field lists right, and
> distributed search should work exactly the same as normal search.
>
> Please file these in the JIRA.
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Asaf work <a...@dapper.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using the SolrJ 1.4 client driver in a sharded Solr configuration and
> am
> > experiencing 2 problems:
> >
> > 1) *The method SolrQuery.setIncludeScore(true)*:
> > The current implementation of setIncludeScore(boolean) *adds *the value
> > "score" to the FL parameter.
> > This causes a problem when using the setFields followed by include score.
> > If I do this:
> >
> > setFields("*");
> > setIncludeScore(true);
> >
> > I would expect the outcome to be "fl=*,score"
> > Instead the outcome is: "fl=* &fl=score" which fails to use the score
> field
> > as FL is not a multi-valued field.
> >
> > The current implementation in the SolrJ SolrQuery object is:
> > add("fl", "score")
> > instead it should be:
> > set("fl", get("fl") + ",score")
> >
> > obviously not as simplistic as that, but you catch my drift...
> >
> > 2) *Propagating "*,score" value to shards*:
> > When doing an HTTP request to a Solr Server using the shards the behavior
> of
> > the response varies.
> >
> > The following requests cause the entire document (all fields) to return
> in
> > the response:
> >
> > http://localhost:8180/solr/cpaCore/select/?q=*:*
> >> http://localhost:8180/solr/cpaCore/select/?q=*:*&fl=score
> >>
> >>
> http://localhost:8180/solr/cpaCore/select/?q=*:*&shards=shardLocation/solr/cpaCore
> >>
> >
> > The following request causes only the fields "id" and "score" to return
> in
> > the response:
> >
> >
> http://localhost:8180/solr/cpaCore/select/?q=*:*&fl=score&shards=localhost:8180/solr/cpaCore
> >>
> >
> > I don't know if this is by design but it does provide for some
> inconsistent
> > behavior, as shard requests behave differently than regular requests.
> > Currently we worked around these 2 issues, I'm just submitting them for
> your
> > opinions and views on whether JIRA issues should be opened.
> >
> >
> > With Thanks
> >  Asaf Ary
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> goks...@gmail.com
>

Reply via email to