Thanks a lot Ron!

2010/2/17 Ron Chan <rc...@i-tao.com>

>
> probably not
>
> if there is no need to embed or programmatically start and stop the server
> then Tomcat would be the safe choice, probably easier to get going with to
> start with and you'll find a lot more information about it
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Radhouani" <r.steve....@gmail.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010 7:24:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Jetty: A Comparative Analysis?
>
> Thanks Ron. Actually, I'm developing a Web search engine. Would that
> matter?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2010/2/16 Ron Chan <rc...@i-tao.com>
>
> >
> > I'd doubt if a performance benchmark would be very useful, it ultimately
> > depends on what you are trying to do and what you are comfortable with.
> >
> > We've had successful deployments on both.
> >
> > Any difference in performance is far outweighed by ease of setup/support
> > that you personally find in each.
> >
> > There is far more "knowledge" around Tomcat, but Jetty is more
> lightweight
> > and real easy to embed.
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Radhouani" <r.steve....@gmail.com>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 16 February, 2010 12:38:04 PM
> > Subject: Tomcat vs Jetty: A Comparative Analysis?
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Is there any analysis out there that may help to choose between Tomcat
> and
> > Jetty to deploy Solr? I wonder wether there's a significant difference
> > between them in terms of performance.
> >
> > Any advice would be much appreciated,
> > -Steve
> >
>

Reply via email to