Thanks Erick,
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> You've tagged facet queries, but looks like you might want to use the
> "excl"ude capability on your filter queries also. Filter queries are
> additive, constraining the results further for each one, and by default
> faceting is based off the search results. Use excl to have facets count
> outside the actual constrained search results.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On May 28, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Ninad Raut wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>> I have a use case where I have to tag facet queries.
>>
>> Here is the code snippet for what I tried:
>> query.addFilterQuery("{!tag=NE}med:Blog AND slev:neutral");
>> query.addFacetQuery("{!tag=NE key=BLOG}med:Blog AND slev:neutral");
>> query.addFilterQuery("{!tag=P}med:Review AND slev:neutral");
>> query.addFacetQuery("{!tag=P key=Review}med:Review AND slev:neutral");
>>
>> The result was {BLOG=0, Review=0}
>>
>> but when I run separate queries :
>>
>> query1.addFilterQuery("{!tag=NE}med:Blog AND slev:neutral");
>> query1.addFacetQuery("{!tag=NE key=BLOG}med:Blog AND slev:neutral");
>> and
>> query2.addFilterQuery("{!tag=P}med:Review AND slev:neutral");
>> query2.addFacetQuery("{!tag=P key=Forum}med:Review AND slev:neutral");
>>
>> I get correct results.
>> {BLOG=98} and {Forum=830} respectively.
>>
>> I want to do this in a single query (with multiple facets). Is there some
>> other way of tagging facet queries?
>>
>> Can any one help me with this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ninad R
>>
>
>
