> i could be wrong but it seems this > way has a performance hit? > > or i am missing something?
Did you read Chris's message in http://search-lucene.com/m/1o5mEk8DjX1/ He proposes alternative (more efficient) way other than [* TO *]
> i could be wrong but it seems this > way has a performance hit? > > or i am missing something?
Did you read Chris's message in http://search-lucene.com/m/1o5mEk8DjX1/ He proposes alternative (more efficient) way other than [* TO *]